Explanation:
The opening sentence reads: "18-hole courses have a standard par score for each hole, which is typically three, four, or five shots, putting the course's standard par between 60 and 72. This could change depending on how far a course is and how many holes there are."
Explanation:
The final sentence explains the significance of the fact that a golfer's handicap can be altered by participating in a "qualifying" event.
Explanation:
In order to give everyone a chance to win, the third paragraph states that a handicap's objective is to make it harder for skilled players to triumph. All horses would finish at nearly the same time if a better horse was carrying more weight.
Explanation:
Using Paley's analogy, Dawkins claims that natural selection is blind in the sense that it doesn't work towards a specific end goal and that the creator of Paley's watch couldn't be blind since doing so would make constructing the watch too difficult or impossible.
Explanation:
The match would be decided by deducting the respective handicaps from the actual scores made, with the lowest score winning, according to the third paragraph's final sentence.
Explanation:
The section from Charles Darwin's theory that reads, "Theory of natural selection as an explanation for the variety and complexity of living beings," supports it. This was not implied to have a secret designer. Events therefore are not planned; they happen by accident.
Explanation:
The first paragraph's statement that "the teleological argument has been often utilized to argue the existence of a Creator or Supreme Being" corroborates this claim.
Explanation:
The teleological argument in the first paragraph suggests the existence of a Supreme Being, which Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection in the second paragraph can be used to refute.
Explanation:
According to paragraph two, authors evoked realism by mimicking real life.
Explanation:
It seems unlikely that readers want a more moral approach because, as stated in paragraph three, epistolary novels were quite moralistic, and the passage provides no further support for this claim. The style was mocked, desires for more narrative forms grew, and leisure behavior (i.e., relaxation) changed, according to what is said.
Explanation:
The genre only receives criticism for its "very moralistic" portrayal of romance.