Explanation:
It tackles the issue of safety as well as the specific worry of risk to children as a particular category of "people."
Explanation:
It is the sole argument that offers evidence to support the claim that it is played by millions of people worldwide.
Explanation:
If Player A is replaced, there is a 30% probability that the opponent team won't score; if Player B is replaced, there is a 50% chance that the opponent team won't score. This suggests that if Player B is changed, there is a 50 - 30 = 20% greater chance of the opposing side failing to score.
Explanation:
since it accepts that a maximum wage would benefit lower-paid workers because it would raise their wages if senior staff members' salaries increased.
Explanation:
We can infer from the facts provided that in order for Mary to choose two green marbles, she must choose two more than the combined quantity of blue and red marbles. The amount of blue marbles is therefore equal to 38 - 23 - 2 = 13.
Explanation:
It highlights a significant and unique benefit of the internet over print publications.
Explanation:
It makes reference to moral issues and emphasizes how the approach would stop borrowers from paying significantly higher interest rates than savers.
Explanation:
This is due to the fact that each throw is independent of the others, meaning that the results of earlier throws will not affect the outcome of the eleventh toss.
Explanation:
If Game 1 is chosen, there is a 4 out of 6 probability that Dice A will land on an even number, and a 2 out of 6 chance that Dice B will land on an even number. There is a 2 out of 6 chance that an odd number will appear on Dice A and a 4 out of 6 chance that an odd number will appear on Dice B if Game 2 is chosen. Therefore, regardless of the game chosen, a person has the same chance of winning.
Explanation:
We can infer from the facts provided that W is telling the truth, X is lying, and Y and Z are also being truthful. Since X or Y would likewise be lying, W cannot be telling the truth. W would be lying if Y were to be telling the truth. Since X would likewise be lying, Z cannot be lying.
Explanation:
In survey X, fewer respondents liked the product than in survey Y.