Explanation:
There is no proof that every baby (without exception) caught up to their peers who were 13 years old. The sentence just asserts that no one has ever shown contrary evidence.
Explanation:
The suggested conclusion is that all 25 candidates for the position of department manager might have prior experience.
The assumption is that 15 of the candidates have experience. The other 10 are left unmentioned, so any one of them potentially be encountered. The second premise gives the candidates the chance to have both attributes.
Explanation:
Although the proposed conclusion in this situation is more nuanced than it was in the preceding query, it nonetheless comes under the category of "reason fallacy."
Despite our initial instinct, there is no more compelling reason to believe that the cause of the baby's sleep issues is the one described in the preceding sample question.
Explanation:
True. In a phrase that continues to discuss the struggle between humans and machines, it is stated that "art remains one of the toughest things."
Explanation:
The text refers to the loss of brain cells rather than necessarily the death of a person when it says that "curing a stroke is a race against time." For instance, partial damage from brain cell loss can include paralysis or a decline in motor skills. There is no evidence in the text to indicate a connection between the death of brain cells and real death, however plausible that may be.
Explanation:
The conclusion suggests a justification that is neither expressly stated in the text nor proven to be true. Basically, it is giving an explanation based on our unique, individual perceptions.
Explanation:
There are one to ten outspoken, inexperienced applicants who applied for the position of department manager.
The second premise, which is an existing premise, says nothing about the other ten choices. Each of them has the option of being assertive but without experience, or assertive but lacking experience (they cannot be both). Although not expressly mentioned in the sentence, the notion of zero candidates being inexperienced and forceful is logically plausible. The conclusion does not follow as a result.