Explanation:
This is the MOST effective response to the presented scenario. The key issue here is for you, as manager, to improve collaboration. Introducing short weekly meetings will do this in what should be perceived as an acceptable manner by your team. It's always good advice to select the solution likely to prove most effective in the long-term.
Explanation:
This is the MOST effective solution, demonstrating collaborative decision-making in seeking a resolution. Plus taking the initiative to address the timing issue. Thirdly, that it's your managerial responsibility to offer balanced feedback. It may be a common issue but an annoying one for others if it is allowed to continue.
Explanation:
This is the MOST effective option. It is because missing deadlines is a major problem that needs to be escalated to your manager. You need to know where they stand on this issue.
Explanation:
This is the least effective response as it does recognize the need for improved collaboration, although this is quite a weak solution. More importantly, it has to be the LEAST effective solution since it does not address the other key need to work more effectively (towards the set objectives).
Explanation:
This is the most effective response since it addresses both the key issues: investigating how to set more effective objectives ; whilst getting buy in to this week's targets from the start.
Explanation:
This is LEAST because this is simply repeating the same problem as your disruptive colleague.
Explanation:
This is the least effective response which could easily backfire. You don't know how the rest of your busy team will react. Also, 'telling off' your new colleague could discourage them from contributing at future meetings.