According to Aquinas, events are ontologically reliant on their causes, and it is impossible for there to be an infinite regress of causes and effects because this would result in an infinite number of things, each of which is ontologically dependent on the next.
Philo claims that Cleanthes' analogy is inadequate and too convoluted to be founded on a sound line of reasoning.
The works of nature exhibit every trace of design and every display of contrivance that was present in watches, with the difference that they are bigger or more so than anything that can be calculated.
This indicates that God, who created everything else, "contains within Himself the whole perfection of being," in Aquinas's words. But God is considered to possess all of his creations' perfections because he is the ultimate cause of our very being.
The most well-known modern supporter of the kalam cosmological argument is William Lane Craig. In its most basic form, the argument goes as follows: (1) Everything that starts to exist has a reason for doing so; (2) the universe started to exist; and (3) as a result, the universe has a reason for existing.
According to Anselm's ontological claim, it is preferable for God to exist both in reality and in a person's mind than for God to exist solely in a person's mind.
An actual infinite cannot exist, according to the following argument. An actual infinite is a temporal regress of occurrences that goes on forever. Therefore, there cannot be an infinite temporal regress of occurrences.
