As mentioned in the Overview, answer choice (c) contains a statement indicating that the FDA has granted conditional approval. This approval is dependent on the drug's ingredients being changed, and there is no evidence that the manufacturer has changed the drug ingredients. As a result, the medicine is unlikely to be safe, and the CEO's assertions appear to be deliberately vague. Optional response (C) is correct
You must review the material in this particular style question to determine which of these five facts was employed to support Diamond's argument. Answers "The fact that diseases were introduced by Europeans" and "The fact that deforestation resulted from animal behavior" are two points that Hunt uses to support his stance; they were used to refute Diamond's central premise, thus they are both inaccurate. Both the statements "The fact that there was proper resource management" and "The fact that there was a natural depletion of food sources" are incorrect. Diamond thought that these cultures' demise was caused by human activity, namely "human recklessness" and "lack of foresight." This concept would not be supported by effective resource management or a natural decrease of food supplies. The last statement of Diamond's opening paragraph, "a lack of foresight," perfectly describes the reason why societies were unable to anticipate the future effectively. A "lack of foresight" is equivalent to a "inability to accurately predict the future," as "foresight" is described as "the ability to predict or the action of predicting what will happen or be needed in the future." Keep in mind that wordplay presents the most challenge in questions with a defined style. The wrong answer options will use comparable but inaccurate descriptions of what you read, while the right answer will frequently use a synonymous but harder to understand form of what is mentioned in the paragraph. The right response is "Cultures' inability to predict the future with any degree of accuracy."
The order of B, C, D, E, F, A satisfies all of the conditions and does
not violate any of them.
A, E, F, C, D, B is incorrect because D must be inspected before E
is, as stated in the conditions.
B, D, E, C, F, A is incorrect because E must be inspected
immediately before F is, as stated in the conditions.
B, D, E, F, A, C is incorrect because A must be inspected either lst
or 6th, as stated in the conditions.
D, C, B, E, F, A is incorrect because if B is inspected 3rd, then E
must be inspected 5th, as stated in the conditions.
According to the author, "It seems to have been a great pest in [Swammerdam's] time; and even Virgil speaks of the "dirum tineae genus," the dreadful offspring of the moth; that is, the worm." If Virgil mentioned the bee-moth, it suggests that ancient civilizations were familiar with its young. By pointing out the other assertions as being untrue, we may also determine the right response. As the author states towards the start of the fourth paragraph, the moths are nocturnal, so we know this. According to the author, "It seems to have been a great pest in [Swammerdam's] time; and even Virgil speaks of the "dirum tineae genus," the dreadful offspring of the moth; that is, the worm." If Virgil mentioned the bee-moth, it suggests that ancient civilizations were familiar with its young. By pointing out the other assertions as being untrue, we may also determine the right response. As the author states towards the start of the fourth paragraph, the moths are nocturnal, so we know this. According to the first sentence of this paragraph, the moth does not arrive before May or April. The aforementioned remark also reveals that the moth was a significant nuisance throughout Swammerdam's lifetime, which was the seventeenth century.
You must review the material in this particular style question to determine which of these five facts was employed to support Diamond's argument. Answers "The fact that diseases were introduced by Europeans" and "The fact that deforestation resulted from animal behavior" are two points that Hunt uses to support his stance; they were used to refute Diamond's central premise, thus they are both inaccurate. Both the statements "The fact that there was proper resource management" and "The fact that there was a natural depletion of food sources" are incorrect. Diamond thought that these cultures' demise was caused by human activity, namely "human recklessness" and "lack of foresight." This concept would not be supported by effective resource management or a natural decrease of food supplies. The last statement of Diamond's opening paragraph, "a lack of foresight," perfectly describes the reason why societies were unable to anticipate the future effectively. A "lack of foresight" is equivalent to a "inability to accurately predict the future," as "foresight" is described as "the ability to predict or the action of predicting what will happen or be needed in the future." Keep in mind that wordplay presents the most challenge in questions with a defined style. The wrong answer options will use comparable but inaccurate descriptions of what you read, while the right answer will frequently use a synonymous but harder to understand form of what is mentioned in the paragraph. The right response is "Cultures' inability to predict the future with any degree of accuracy."
D is unable to be planned for day 5 because D is required to be scheduled.
E must come before F, and F must come before E. If D is the case,
If E and F are scheduled for day 5, there will be no room for them.
D is the next scheduled event.
All of the other options can be arranged without difficulty.
For day 5, there is a contradiction, and hence you are incorrect.
Like in most more difficult particular style problems, wordplay and/or word choice are the main sources of difficulty. Find the forums where these topics are discussed first. You would anticipate to find each of these following the sentence that begins the second paragraph, "Modern feminist literary criticism has taken a variety of new routes, particularly in the tradition of the Frankfurt School's critical theory." You can easily find the phrases "deconstructing existing relations of power in relation to gender," "viewing gender as a tangible political contribution," and "viewing gender in terms of Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalysis" in the second sentence of the paragraph, so you know none of those are accurate.
We're attempting to figure out if four or more people can fit in. kids to have black hair, because we know there are three types of black hair. Brown haired students. Because three of the eight students are absent, That leaves five people with brown hair. Based on the second and fifth paragraphs of the second and fifth paragraphs of the second and We know that one of the five has red hair, so that leaves four. We know there must be at least one based on the fifth condition. There are three blondes left. As a result, the absolute maximum is There would have to be three students with black hair, which is equal to the amount of students who have brown hair
It does not seem that the author believes that it is necessary to condemn intuitive morality; rather, he is interested in knowing what exactly these moral judgements are, in analyzing categories instead of using them. However, "analysis" seems to be the closest synonym because it involves a more rigorous level of intellectual evaluation and research than simple remark.
The TIPS Report and its creation are the text's sole subjects of discussion. Consequently, the best response is:
Describe a sort of report that the United States produces.
You must check which four of the answer options were mentioned in the passage for this specific type of "EXCEPT" question. Here, you must confirm that they served as the two researchers' supporting documentation. You discover that Diamond researched the Anasazi of the American southwest in the opening paragraph when it refers to "overuse of pasture land by animals of the Anasazi in the American southwest", but you are not informed of what he believes particularly caused their extinction. The phrase "overuse of pasture land by animals of the Anasazi in the American southwest" is valid because there is no mention of excessive pasture use. You learn that Diamond's work focused on "commonalities between deforestation in Easter Island and resource depletion in ancient Greenland" relating to his theory that "human recklessness" and "lack of foresight" were the cause of the disappearance. This is in reference to "deforestation on Easter Island resulting from reckless behavior or lack of foresight" and "resource depletion in Greenland resulting from reckless behavior or lack of foresight."
The third paragraph, which states that "the bees that have to guard the entrances against their intrusion, will be seen acting as vigilant sentinels, performing continual rounds near this important post, extending their antenna to the utmost, and moving them to the right and left alternately. Woe to the unfortunate moth that comes within their reach!", supports this response.
The bee-moth is described in the passage using the word as it "[turns] many of the ingenious fixtures design to entrap or exclude it, into actual aids and comforts in its nefarious designs." In other words, the moth is using the things that were intended to stop it for its nefarious, or wicked, designs. The greatest response alternative for "wicked" is "righteous," or good.