According to the theory, maintaining a healthy back requires balanced muscle development, thus training the opposing sides of the back equally is crucial. Connecting the two premises in this argument requires the statement, "Exercising opposite sides of the back unequally will lead to imbalanced muscular development."
As judge-made law is to codified law, the common law is to statutes. Statutes are legal rules that have been recorded and "codified" in a structured manner. The common law originated with judicially issued legal rules intended to settle conflicts. The common law and statutes are two types of legal norms, just as democracy and totalitarianism are two types of governments. However, Answer B is a better option because judge-made law and codified law are separate terminology for the common law and statutes.
There are arguments that can be derived from passage B that are supported by supporting evidence. However, for the purposes of this question, the statements of claim and supporting data given in Passage B paragraph 1 are the appropriate response. The other answer options consist of assertions without any supporting details found in Passage B.
Because it depicts a thought or notion that only appears in passage B and not passage A, the correct answer choice is the sole acceptable solution. As the complexity and velocity of climatic changes become more apparent, particularly during post-glacial eras, the assumption that the earth's crust is to blame for geological climate changes is becoming untenable, according to the author of Passage B. It indicates that the earth's surface travels upward and downward at a rate and with a facility that seem impossible. The author of passage A also raises the possibility that the glacial era (Ice Age) caused climate changes, but he bases his argument on the earth and the sun rather than applying the notion to land-based climatic changes like volcanoes. Additional answer options are either absent from passage B or do not correspond to the assumptions made in either passage.
The primary subject of both chapters is the relationship between astronomical storms and climate change, specifically how it may or may not affect the earth's crust. The effects of astrological changes leading to a changing geological environment or the reverse are discussed in passage A. In contrast, the author of Passage B emphasizes how our climate locations are impacted by geological changes on the earth's surface. According to the passage's evidence, the additional response options only accurately reflect one or the other comparison articles, not both at once.
The correct response option, which can be found in Passage A-end of paragraph, raises the possibility that the assertion of possible impacts of climate change is demonstrable and is supported by citing the statements of Sir John Herschel and a few other astronomers who focused their attention on the consideration. The other answer choices don't explicitly spell out the evidence supporting the assertions in Passage A alone.
Through making assertions and citing evidence relating to the climate impacts, such as the cause and effect of astronomical causes to our geological climate and passage B's intention to understand the geological changes from the earth's surface and below, both authors identified with the effects of climate change and crisis. Additional response options are either inaccurate claims not contained in either passage or do not connect to the core issue focus of the two passages, which is climate impacts.