They help strengthen your position by addressing opposing views. Addressing counterarguments demonstrates thorough analysis and helps anticipate potential weaknesses in your argument.
Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion. IRAC is a common framework for organizing legal analysis, helping attorneys structure their reasoning logically.
Analogizing involves showing how similar cases support your position, while distinguishing involves showing how different facts or issues make precedent less applicable.
Policy analysis considers the social, economic, and moral impacts of legal rules and can influence decisions in ambiguous cases.
The first step in legal analysis is recognizing the key legal issues or questions presented by the facts of the case, which will guide your analysis.
