Breaking a large team into smaller groups allows for more focused discussions and makes it easier for everyone to participate. By reconvening, the entire team can benefit from each subgroup’s insights, making the process more efficient and inclusive.
Encouraging each team member to present the pros and cons allows the team to understand each perspective fully. This approach fosters a collaborative environment, enables an informed decision, and increases the likelihood of team buy-in and consensus.
Calling on the team member in a non-confrontational way encourages participation while respecting their comfort level. This approach helps quieter team members feel included and valued, often leading to valuable insights from all team members.
A private discussion allows the facilitator to address the issue respectfully and understand any underlying causes, such as workload issues or skill gaps. This approach is likely to improve accountability and foster a constructive relationship within the team.
Facilitating an open discussion allows each team member to present their viewpoint respectfully, which can lead to understanding and compromise. This approach helps maintain objectivity, reduces tension, and allows the team to choose the best approach based on reasoned debate.
