Explanation:
The fourth sentence claims that the policy raises China's per capita Gross domestic product, but this is only one economic indicator and is based on output per person. The passage does not say whether the one-child policy has increased the country's overall wealth. Because the passage does not specify, we must respond Cannot Say.
Explanation:
The sixth and eighth sentences mention that there is a demand for ivory from China and Japan, while the tenth suggests that the ban is driving up prices rather than the supply of ivory. In either case, the passage does not categorically state that this is true or false, so we are unable to make a judgment.
Explanation:
In the fifth sentence, it is stated that there are "limitations," and then it cites two examples after the phrase "amongst others." According to what we have been told, there are more than two restrictions.
Explanation:
The final sentence simply states that millions of sibling-free couples can have two children and makes no assumptions about the implications.
Explanation:
According to the passage, free association occurs when workers form an association to create a product, and thus production is controlled by the workers rather than the state. While the ninth sentence refers to mutualism as free-market socialism, the tenth sentence states that supporters of mutualism object to the "inequalities created by government intervention."
Explanation:
According to the second sentence, hundreds of organizations are attempting to gain federal recognition. The final two sentences state that membership in a federally recognized tribe is the legal definition of Indian. As a result, many American Indians do not meet the legal definition.
Explanation:
According to sentence eight, the belief in "free credit" allows mutual banking establishments to generate profits, but these profits are shared among union members rather than bankers. So, regardless of who receives it, we are told that banks do indeed operate for profit.
