Explanation:
Pilots who use "have numbers" do not necessarily mean they have received the ATIS broadcast. In addition, if their workload permits, the controller will issue traffic advisories. At the time of initial contact with the relevant approach control facility, this information will be provided.
Explanation:
The VOR has exceptional course alignment accuracy, typically plus or minus 1 degree. Roughness. On some VORs, a course needle or brief flag alarm activity may be seen as a sign of mild course roughness (some receivers are more subject to these irregularities than others).
Explanation:
A safe, efficient, and timely flow of traffic around an airport is made possible by airport traffic control towers.
Explanation:
Use the runway that is closest to being aligned with the wind when it is 5 knots or more or the "calm wind" runway when it is less than 5 knots, except if a "runway use" program is in place (set the tetrahedron accordingly). NOTE- 1. Pilots are expected to inform ATC if they desire to utilize a different runway than the one that is designated.
Explanation:
Airport traffic control towers ensure a quick, efficient, and safe flow of traffic around an airport. Towers also provide for the separation of Instrument Flight Rules aircraft in the terminal areas when the duty is delegated.
Explanation:
All ground traffic, including aircraft taxiing from gates to takeoff runways and from landing runways to gates, is the responsibility of the ground controller.
Explanation:
RVSM was used to lower the vertical separation requirement over FL 290 from a minimum of 2000 feet to a minimum of 1000 feet. It increases the capacity of the airspace, enabling airplanes to safely fly more optimal profiles, and results in fuel savings. A research was necessary to compare possible performance under the new requirement of 1000 feet with actual performance under the previous standard of 2000 feet in order to change the separation standard safely.
