Explanation:
Given her income and contribution, she will receive $500 on the first $2,500 contribution, $500 on the second $2,500 contribution (as a catch-up CESG), and $100 (20% of $500) as an enhanced CESG based on her lower income. Note – no catch-up grant is provided on the enhanced CESG portion for low-income families.
Explanation:
Option 1 is correct. Mortgage-backed securities are considered income investments as they pay both interest and principal on a monthly basis. Option 3 is correct. Preferred shares are like debt instruments that have a fixed price and pay a fixed dividend rate, which is usually significantly higher than dividends paid by common stock.
Explanation:
The only option available for Hank and Georgina to split income for tax purposes is for him to contribute to her RRSP. If Hank contributes to Georgina's TFSA, it will help her shelter income but it will not help for tax purposes unless she contributes directly. Georgina deferring her pension will reduce household income but will not split income between them.
Explanation:
Option 1 is correct. Transferring an asset into joint ownership removes probate as the asset would transfer automatically to the other joint tenant when one dies. Option 3 is correct. Naming a beneficiary to a registered account removes the asset from probate and transfers directly on death.
Explanation:
If Richard purchases common shares in Glennatical, he will have a conflict of interest as Glenn's financial planner. Richard can influence Glenn into strategies that will benefit Glennatical which will directly provide monetary gain (common share ownership) for Richard in the short run. The financial planner should advise that they may not be able to continue in a professional relationship if a conflict of interest materializes in the future. Providing this information early on increases the level of trust and respect between the client and the financial planner.
Explanation:
Step 1 is to calculate the accumulation of assets up to retirement:
N = 5
I = 5%
PV = $850,000
PMT = 0
Solve for FV = $1,084,839
Step 2 is to calculate the retirement income based on the asset value growth in Step 1:
MODE = BEG
N = (92 - 60 years)
PV = $1,084,839
I = 7%
FV = 0
Solve for PMT = $80,170
Explanation:
The lump-sum payment to Michelle would be $2500. Amount payable under CPP is equal to 6 times the actual retirement pension the contributor was receiving or would have received, to a maximum of $2,500. Kip's monthly CPP payment of $495 multiplied by 6 would be greater than the CPP maximum allowed. ($2970 > $2500 MAX).
Explanation:
Charitable donations eligible for the tax credit are subject to a limit of 75% of net income. But in the year of death, it equals 100%, thus the entire $200,000 in his income in the year of death is eligible for the tax credit.
Explanation:
Option 3 is correct. Once a joint tenancy is triggered, Barry can no longer make decisions solely on his own related to the property. Option 4 is correct. The investment property can be included in family property on marriage breakdown and he could have the asset or its value transferred to someone that is beyond his wishes (i.e. an ex-son or daughter in law).
Explanation:
Cash Allocation (10,000/175,000) = 6%
Fixed Income Allocation - (RRSP MBS + Pension Plan - Gov't Bond + CMHC Bond) - (30,000 + 25,000 + 40,000) / 175,000 = 54%
Equities (Pension Plan - Mutual fund + TFSA - S&P TSX 60 ETF) - (25,000 + 45,000) / 175,000 = 40%
Explanation:
TFSA dollar limit is announced each year. This amount, plus previous years contribution limit, plus any withdrawals, makes up your max TFSA contribution in any year.