GGST - Global General Service Verbal Reasoning: Logic Questions and Answers

Question 1

Read the following statements:
1. All project managers are certified.
2. Some certified professionals are engineers.

Based on these statements, which of the following conclusions is logically certain?

Accepted Answer

No certain conclusion can be drawn.

Answer

The first statement says all project managers (A) are certified (B). The second says some certified professionals (B) are engineers (C). While there is an overlap between A and B, and B and C, there is no guaranteed overlap between A and C. The engineers who are certified might be a different group from the project managers who are certified. Therefore, no certain conclusion can be drawn about the relationship between project managers and engineers.

Question 2

A UN report states: 'If a country improves its educational standards, its economic growth will increase. If its economic growth increases, its poverty rate will decrease.' Assuming these statements are true, what can be logically concluded?

Accepted Answer

If a country improves its educational standards, its poverty rate will decrease.

Answer

This is a simple chain of conditional logic (a syllogism). If A leads to B, and B leads to C, then A leads to C. In this case, improving educational standards (A) leads to increased economic growth (B), and increased economic growth (B) leads to a decreased poverty rate (C). Therefore, improving educational standards (A) leads to a decreased poverty rate (C).

Question 3

Consider the argument: 'Every staff member who attended the advanced training completed the certification. Maria is a staff member who completed the certification. Therefore, Maria must have attended the advanced training.' Which logical fallacy is committed in this argument?

Accepted Answer

Affirming the Consequent

Answer

The argument has the form: If P (attended training), then Q (completed certification). We know Q is true (Maria completed certification). The conclusion is that P must be true (Maria attended training). This is the fallacy of Affirming the Consequent. Just because attending the training guarantees certification, it doesn't mean it's the only way to get certified. Maria could have gotten certified through another path.

Question 4

Read the premises:
- No successful projects are over budget.
- Some of the recently launched initiatives were over budget.

Which of the following conclusions logically follows from the premises?

Accepted Answer

Some of the recently launched initiatives were not successful projects.

Answer

If a project is over budget, it cannot be successful (from premise 1). Since some recently launched initiatives were over budget (premise 2), it logically follows that those specific over-budget initiatives cannot be successful projects. Therefore, at least some of the recently launched initiatives were not successful.

Question 5

A manager makes the following statement: 'We must either cut travel expenses or reduce hiring. Since reducing hiring would harm our long-term growth, we have no choice but to cut travel expenses.' This reasoning is an example of:

Accepted Answer

A Disjunctive Syllogism

Answer

A disjunctive syllogism is a valid argument form which is a syllogism having a disjunctive statement for one of its premises. The structure is: P or Q. Not P. Therefore, Q. In this case, 'P' is cutting travel expenses and 'Q' is reducing hiring. The argument is presented as (P or Q). The manager then argues against Q (reducing hiring is bad), concluding P (we must cut travel). This is a classic disjunctive syllogism.

GGST - Global General Service Test Practice Test

GGST - Global General Service Test Practice Test

GGST - Global General Service Verbal Reasoning: Logic Questions and Answers