The Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) is the standard assessment used by Magic Circle law firms β including Clifford Chance, Freshfields, Linklaters, Allen & Overy, and Slaughter and May β as well as leading consulting firms and graduate employers worldwide. Of its five sections, the Inference section is consistently rated the most difficult by candidates.
The Inference section tests your ability to distinguish between what a passage actually states and what you might assume, infer, or believe to be true. Each question presents a short passage of factual information followed by a series of proposed inferences. Your task is to evaluate how well each inference is supported by the facts in the passage alone β not by your background knowledge, not by common sense, and not by what seems likely in the real world.
This is a fundamentally different skill from reading comprehension. You are not asked whether something is true in general β you are asked whether it follows necessarily and directly from the passage. Law firms prize this skill because it mirrors the analytical rigour required to advise clients: an associate who conflates evidence with assumption is a liability.
The section typically contains 5 passages, each with 5 proposed inferences, giving 25 items total. You must classify each inference using a 5-point scale.
Detailed preparation resources, including timed practice sets and full-length simulations, are available on our Watson Glaser complete guide and via our Watson Glaser practice test.
The inference follows definitely and necessarily from the passage. There is no room for doubt whatsoever. The passage explicitly states β or logically necessitates β the inference beyond any question. Use this only when the conclusion is airtight. If you feel even a sliver of uncertainty, it is not True.
The inference is more likely true than not based on the passage. The passage provides solid supporting evidence but does not make it certain. The inference goes slightly beyond what is stated but is a reasonable, well-supported conclusion. This is the answer when evidence points in one direction without being conclusive.
The passage provides no meaningful evidence for or against the inference. You cannot tell from the passage alone whether the inference is true or false. The information needed simply is not there. This is often the correct answer when candidates are tempted to rely on outside knowledge or gut feeling.
The inference is more likely false than true based on the passage. The passage contains evidence that contradicts or undermines the inference, but the contradiction is not absolute β there remains a small possibility the inference could be true. Use when the passage leans against the inference without fully ruling it out.
The inference directly contradicts what the passage states. The passage makes it impossible for the inference to be true. This is a strong answer β reserve it for cases where the passage explicitly rules out the inference, not merely where the inference seems unlikely or unsupported.
Even strong analytical thinkers make predictable errors on the Inference section. Understanding these traps in advance is half the battle.
This is the single most common error. Candidates read a passage about, say, economic growth in a country they know well, and mark an inference True because they know from experience that it is correct. The inference section does not care what you know β it only cares what the passage says. If the passage does not support it, the answer cannot be True or Probably True, regardless of real-world accuracy.
Candidates frequently mark inferences as True when the passage only makes them Probably True. True requires absolute certainty from the passage. A passage stating “most employees were satisfied” does not make it True that “the majority of staff would recommend the company” β it makes it Probably True at best. Precision here separates high scorers from the rest.
When a passage says nothing about a topic, the answer is Insufficient Data β not False. False means the passage actively contradicts the inference. A passage that simply does not mention a topic leaves the inference neither supported nor contradicted: that is Insufficient Data. Many candidates default to False when they cannot see support for an inference; this is incorrect.
Words like “always,” “never,” “all,” and “none” in an inference are red flags. A passage that supports a general trend rarely supports an absolute. “Sales increased in most regions” does not support “sales increased in all regions.” Absolute qualifiers in inferences almost always indicate False or Probably False.
Under time pressure, candidates skim passages and miss nuance. Each passage is short β rarely more than 4β5 sentences β so read it carefully twice before answering. The few seconds saved by skimming cost more in wrong answers than they gain in time.
For broader test strategy, see our 7 tips to pass the Watson Glaser. For practice on related analytical skills, our verbal reasoning and numerical reasoning sections also help build precision.