Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Evaluating Argument Relevance Questions and Answers

Question 1

A city council is debating whether to ban single-use plastic bags to reduce pollution. Which of the following arguments is the MOST relevant to the debate?

Accepted Answer

"Several major cities in other countries have successfully implemented similar bans, resulting in a measurable decrease in plastic waste in waterways."

Answer

The most relevant argument provides evidence from comparable situations that directly addresses the intended outcome of the proposal. The success of similar bans in other cities is directly related to the goal of reducing pollution. The mayor's approval rating is an irrelevant 'ad hominem' attack. A personal preference for paper bags is anecdotal and not a strong basis for a city-wide policy. While the environmental impact of paper bags is a related topic, the immediate question is about a plastic bag ban, making the data on plastic ban effectiveness most relevant.

Question 2

A company proposes to cut costs by outsourcing its customer service department to a third-party firm overseas. The stated goals are to reduce operational expenses and maintain the current level of customer satisfaction. Which argument is the WEAKEST and least relevant?

Accepted Answer

"The CEO of our main competitor said in an interview that he would never consider outsourcing because it's unpatriotic."

Answer

This argument is weak because it relies on the opinion of an external party (a competitor's CEO) and appeals to emotion ('unpatriotic') rather than providing data relevant to the company's specific goals of cost reduction and customer satisfaction. The other arguments are all strong and directly relevant as they provide data on cost savings, customer preferences, and the potential partner's performance.

Question 3

A school board is considering a proposal to make school uniforms mandatory for all students. The primary goal is to improve student focus on academics by reducing distractions related to clothing. Which of the following is the most relevant counter-argument?

Accepted Answer

"A comprehensive study of schools that implemented uniform policies found no statistically significant impact on academic performance or disciplinary issues."

Answer

The most relevant counter-argument directly challenges the premise of the proposal using objective evidence. Since the stated goal is to improve academic focus, a study showing that uniforms have no significant academic impact is the most direct and powerful rebuttal. The argument about stifling individuality is a valid concern but is subjective. The financial burden is a relevant practical issue but doesn't address the core academic goal. The attack on the board member is an irrelevant ad hominem fallacy.

Question 4

An advertisement for a new sports drink, 'Vigorade,' features a famous Olympic athlete who claims the drink is the key to their success. In evaluating the argument that one should buy Vigorade to improve athletic performance, why is this celebrity endorsement considered a weak argument?

Accepted Answer

Because the athlete's success is attributable to numerous factors like training and genetics, not just one drink.

Answer

This argument is weak because it oversimplifies the cause of the athlete's success, creating a flawed causal claim. The athlete's performance is the result of many relevant factors, and attributing it to a single product is a logical fallacy. While the payment (A) suggests bias, the core logical weakness is the oversimplification of cause and effect. Cost (C) and ingredients (D) are practical considerations but do not address the central flaw in the argument's reasoning.

Question 5

A manager argues, "We should not hire John for the sales position. I heard from a friend that he is going through a messy divorce." Why is this argument not relevant to the hiring decision?

Accepted Answer

It focuses on a personal circumstance that is unrelated to the candidate's professional qualifications and ability to perform the job.

Answer

The core weakness of this argument is its lack of relevance. A candidate's personal life, such as a divorce, has no direct bearing on their professional skills, experience, or potential job performance. While the other options are also true and represent poor practice (relying on hearsay, violating policy), the fundamental flaw in the argument itself is that the reason given is irrelevant to the candidate's qualifications for the job.

Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Practice Test

Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Practice Test

Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Evaluating Argument Relevance Questions and Answers