Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Cheat Sheet 2026
The 30 highest-yield Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal facts, distilled from real exam questions. Print it, save it as a PDF, or study it here — free, no sign-up.
80 questions
60 min time limit
65% to pass
- Statement: 'All mammals are warm-blooded. Dolphins are mammals.' Conclusion: 'Therefore, dolphins are warm-blooded.' Evaluate this conclusion. → The conclusion follows necessarily from the given statements.
- Some employees who pass the aptitude test are offered promotions. James passed the aptitude test. What can be deduced? → James may or may not be offered a promotion.
- A weather report states: 'Temperatures dropped 15°C over six hours, and snowfall began at 11 PM.' Which of the following is an inference? → A cold front moved through the area causing the temperature drop and snow.
- All Watson-Glaser sections require careful reading of a passage before answering. A test taker skips reading the passage. What deductively follows? → The test taker is not meeting the requirement of that section.
- In a Watson-Glaser context, which statement about a passage describing a correlation between two events is most defensible? → The correlation shows an association that may or may not reflect a causal relationship.
- All Supreme Court justices have law degrees. Some law professors have argued cases before the Supreme Court. Which conclusion is valid? → Some people who argued cases before the Supreme Court are not justices
- Data shows that country X has an average life expectancy of 82 years, while country Y has 69 years. Which conclusion is best supported by this data alone? → People in country X live longer on average than those in country Y.
- Some US law firms require Watson-Glaser scores for associate hiring. Blake is applying to a US law firm. What can be deduced? → Blake's firm may or may not require a Watson-Glaser score.
- Premises: 'All managers in Division A are certified accountants. Some certified accountants are also licensed auditors.' What conclusion necessarily follows? → Some Division A managers may be licensed auditors.
- A study found that students who eat breakfast score an average of 12% higher on standardized tests than those who skip breakfast. What conclusion can be drawn? → There is a positive association between eating breakfast and higher test scores
- Argument: 'Since Andrea speaks three languages fluently, she will be an excellent translator.' What unstated assumption is the argument making? → Speaking multiple languages fluently is sufficient to be an excellent translator.
- No employees in the legal department are authorized to approve budget increases. Sarah is authorized to approve budget increases. What must be true? → Sarah is not in the legal department.
- Which of the following is a defining characteristic of a deductively valid conclusion? → If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.
- Argument: 'Either we invest massively in military spending, or we will be invaded by foreign powers.' What fallacy does this commit? → False dilemma — it presents only two options when many middle-ground positions exist.
- Every report submitted after the deadline is rejected. This report was submitted on time. What follows? → Nothing definitive can be concluded about this report's acceptance.
- A line graph shows that a city's annual rainfall decreased steadily from 800mm to 550mm over 20 years. Which interpretation is most appropriate? → The data shows a sustained downward trend in annual rainfall over the 20-year period.
- Which approach is MOST effective when trying to identify bias in a written argument? → Examine whether evidence from only one perspective is consistently presented
- Argument: 'Alternative medicine has been practiced for thousands of years, which proves it is effective.' What type of fallacy is this? → Appeal to tradition — long historical use is treated as proof of effectiveness.
- Argument: 'We should hire the candidate who has the most years of experience for this management role.' What unstated assumption does this argument make? → Years of experience is the best or most important predictor of management performance.
- A study finds that people who own pets report higher happiness scores. The researcher concludes that owning a pet causes happiness. Which error is present? → Confusing correlation with causation
- A financial news headline reads: 'Tech giant reports 40% year-on-year profit increase.' Which of the following is an inference? → The tech giant's business performance improved significantly over the past year.
- If reasoning test scores predict job performance, then hiring based on such scores is justified. Reasoning test scores do predict job performance. Therefore: → Hiring based on reasoning test scores is justified.
- A school implements a reading program. Test scores improve. To best determine if the program caused the improvement, researchers should: → Compare results to a control group that did not receive the program.
- An argument states: 'Our company has operated this way for 50 years, so it must be the correct approach.' Which reasoning error does this reflect? → Appeal to tradition
- A politician says: 'My opponent voted against increasing police budgets, which shows he doesn't care about public safety.' What fallacy is this? → Straw man — it misrepresents the opponent's position to make it easier to attack.
- Argument: 'Thousands of people have bought this supplement, so it must be effective.' What fallacy does this commit? → Ad populum (bandwagon fallacy) — popularity is used as evidence of effectiveness.
- Premises: 'Every contract signed before March 1st is subject to the old tax rate. Contract 47 was signed on February 15th.' What conclusion necessarily follows? → Contract 47 is subject to the old tax rate.
- Premises: 'All employees who pass the certification exam receive a salary increase. Maria passed the certification exam.' What conclusion necessarily follows? → Maria will receive a salary increase.
- Which of the following BEST describes 'in-group bias' as it applies to critical reasoning and argument evaluation? → Evaluating evidence more favorably when it originates from members of one's own group
- A person argues that a herbal supplement is safe because 'natural things cannot be harmful.' Which type of reasoning error is present? → Appeal to nature fallacy
Turn these facts into recall: