An LEP patient at a federally funded community health center is offered her adult son as an interpreter instead of a qualified professional interpreter. The patient accepts reluctantly. This situation:
-
A
Is fully compliant with Title VI as long as the son is fluent in both languages
-
B
Meets CLAS standards since the patient did not formally object to the arrangement
-
C
May violate the patient's right to meaningful, confidential access under Title VI and ACA Section 1557
-
D
Is appropriate if the clinic documents that professional interpreters were unavailable at the time