Since the beginning of civilization, people have engaged in conflict. They have done this in exchange for food, land, resources, and slaves. The battle over weapons has fueled numerous technological advancements. Although it may be in our nature to be aggressive, there are numerous ethical concerns with war, and most people would consider it to be a completely terrible activity. During conflicts, unspeakable atrocities happen, yet warfare has typically been governed by implicit laws and norms of conduct. The 1949 Geneva Conventions are still regarded as the foundation of current international humanitarian law, despite the fact that combat has altered significantly since then. Both civilians caught up in the conflict and combatants who are out of the line of fire are protected by them. All recent international armed engagements, such as the war in Georgia, the invasion of Afghanistan, the invasion of Iraq, and the invasion of Chechnya, were governed by these accords. The victims of non-international armed conflicts, like the civil war in Syria, are likewise protected under the Geneva Conventions. Conventions establish guidelines that governments and military commanders must follow and defend in international courts, but it has becoming harder to maintain the fictitious distinction between combatants and civilians. In the Second World War, both Germany and Britain carried out massive bombing campaigns with the intention of terrorizing civilians as much as killing soldiers and destroying equipment. The increase of terrorism as a form of conflict has made matters even more complicated. Drones are being used in challenging battle zones as a secure and dependable way to attack terrorists or soldiers who move through or reside in civilian neighborhoods, raising ethical concerns for their operators. The purpose of the Geneva Conventions is to
