PSA - Professional Sports Authenticator Vintage vs. Modern Cards Questions and Answers

Question 1

A grader is comparing a 1950s Bowman card with a 2020s Prizm Chrome card. Which of the following statements most accurately describes a key difference in the card stock and its impact on grading?

Accepted Answer

The softer, more porous stock of the vintage card makes it more susceptible to toning and surface wrinkles, which are evaluated within the context of the issue.

Answer

Modern chrome cards use a thicker card stock that is immune to surface scratches and print lines.

Answer

Vintage card stock is denser, making it less likely to suffer from corner wear than modern, flimsier stock.

Answer

Both vintage and modern cards are graded on the exact same surface wear standards, regardless of stock type.

Question 2

When evaluating the edges of a 1960s Topps card, a grader notes a distinct 'rough cut' or 'feathering' along one edge. How should this be assessed compared to a similar-looking flaw on an ultra-modern card?

Accepted Answer

'Rough cuts' are often a characteristic of the manufacturing process for vintage cards and are generally not penalized as harshly as they would be on a modern card, where clean, sharp edges are the standard.

Answer

The flaw is considered a major defect on both cards, likely limiting the grade to PSA 5 or lower.

Answer

This is a sign of alteration on the vintage card but a minor factory flaw on the modern card.

Answer

This characteristic is completely ignored on vintage cards but automatically disqualifies a modern card from receiving a numerical grade.

Question 3

Which of the following best describes how PSA differentiates between acceptable natural toning on a vintage card and a defect on a modern card?

Accepted Answer

Even, gradual toning on the borders of a vintage card is often considered a natural aging process and may be acceptable for a high grade, whereas similar discoloration on a modern card would be considered a significant flaw.

Answer

Any and all discoloration, regardless of age, is treated as a stain and will result in a lower grade or a qualifier.

Answer

Toning is only acceptable on pre-WWII cards; any card from the 1950s or later with toning is automatically given the ST (Stain) qualifier.

Answer

Modern cards are designed to tone attractively over time, while vintage cards with toning are considered environmentally damaged.

Question 4

A grader observes a 1972 Topps card where the color layers are slightly misaligned, creating a blurry or out-of-focus appearance. This same effect is noted on a 2021 Topps Chrome card. How would PSA's evaluation of this flaw likely differ between the two cards?

Accepted Answer

The poor print registration is more common and tolerated to a greater degree on the vintage card, while it would be a more significant factor in lowering the grade of the modern card due to higher printing standards.

Answer

The flaw is ignored on both cards as a common printing variation.

Answer

It is considered a major error on the vintage card but a minor defect on the modern card.

Answer

Both cards would receive the PD (Print Defect) qualifier, regardless of the year of issue.

Question 5

A grader is evaluating two cards, both of which are otherwise in Gem Mint condition. Card A is a 1957 Topps with a single, small spot of 'print snow'. Card B is a 2019 Topps Chrome Refractor with a single, faint 'refractor line'. Which statement best reflects how these common flaws would likely impact the final grade?

Accepted Answer

The print snow on the vintage card may allow it to still grade MINT 9, while the refractor line on the modern card would almost certainly prevent it from grading above NM-MT 8.

Answer

Both flaws are considered minor, and both cards will likely still achieve a PSA 10 grade.

Answer

The refractor line is a recognized variation and will not affect the grade, but the print snow will lower the vintage card's grade significantly.

Answer

Both cards would be downgraded to the EX-MT 6 range due to having surface defects.

Question 6

A grader identifies that a 1968 Topps card has a 'diamond cut,' where the card's edges are parallel but the corners do not form perfect 90-degree angles. How does PSA typically treat this characteristic?

Accepted Answer

It is a factory cutting flaw that is factored into the final numerical grade, often preventing a high-end grade, but is not considered an alteration.

Answer

It is treated as evidence of trimming and the card will be returned as altered.

Answer

This flaw automatically results in an MC (Miscut) qualifier, regardless of the card's other attributes.

Answer

Diamond cuts are only considered a flaw on modern cards; they are ignored on vintage cards issued before 1980.