← All PCR Flashcard Decks

Quality Assurance & Control Flashcards

7 cards from real PCR practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Quality Assurance & Control flashcards as text
  1. A qPCR standard curve slope of -3.32 corresponds to what amplification efficiency?

    Answer: 100%

    Using E = 10^(-1/slope) - 1, a slope of -3.32 gives perfect doubling each cycle, which is 100% efficiency.

  2. What range of amplification efficiency is generally considered acceptable for a validated qPCR assay?

    Answer: 90-110%

    Efficiencies of 90-110% (slopes of about -3.6 to -3.1) are the standard acceptance range.

  3. A standard curve has a slope of -3.9. What does this indicate?

    Answer: Efficiency of about 80%, below the acceptable range

    A slope of -3.9 gives about 80% efficiency, which points to a suboptimal assay design or inhibition.

  4. What is the typical minimum acceptable R² value for a qPCR standard curve?

    Answer: 0.98 or higher

    An R² of at least 0.98 (often ≥0.99) shows the dilution points fall tightly on a linear fit.

  5. A SYBR Green melt curve shows one peak at 84°C and a second peak at 74°C. What does the lower peak most likely represent?

    Answer: Primer-dimers or nonspecific products

    Short primer-dimers melt at lower temperatures than the specific amplicon, which produces an extra low-Tm peak.

  6. The limit of detection (LOD) for a clinical PCR assay is commonly defined as the lowest concentration that is:

    Answer: Detected in at least 95% of replicates

    LOD is usually the lowest concentration detected in at least 95% of replicate tests.

  7. Technical triplicates for one sample show Ct values of 24.1, 24.2, and 26.8. What is the best QC action?

    Answer: Treat the outlier as a technical failure and investigate or repeat

    Replicate Ct values should normally agree within about 0.3-0.5 cycles, so a 2.6-cycle outlier suggests a pipetting or well error.

How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. We have not yet matched this exam's facts to an official source, so confirm fees, dates and rules with the exam body. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy