HBRI - Hogan Business Reasoning Inventory Qualitative Reasoning: Verbal Logic Questions and Answers

Question 1

A business report states: 'All successful marketing campaigns increase brand visibility. Some of our recent campaigns have not increased brand visibility.' Based on these statements, which of the following conclusions is logically certain?

Accepted Answer

Some of our recent campaigns were not successful.

Answer

This is a deductive reasoning problem. The first premise is a universal statement: ALL successful campaigns have a certain quality (increasing visibility). The second premise states that SOME recent campaigns lack this quality. Therefore, it must be true that those specific campaigns that did not increase brand visibility cannot be classified as successful.

Question 2

Complete the analogy: CEO is to Company as General is to ________.

Accepted Answer

Army

Answer

The relationship in the analogy is one of leadership over an entire organization. A CEO is the head of a Company, and a General is the head of an Army. The other options represent parts of the whole (Soldier), an outcome (Victory), or a tool used by the leader (Strategy), but not the organization itself.

Question 3

A manager is evaluating a new software implementation. The project lead states, 'The rollout will either be on-time or over-budget, but not both.' If the project lead's statement is true, which of the following scenarios is impossible?

Accepted Answer

The rollout is on-time and over-budget.

Answer

The statement 'either...or..., but not both' establishes an exclusive disjunction. This means only one of the two conditions (on-time, over-budget) can be true. The option where the rollout is both 'on-time' and 'over-budget' directly contradicts the 'but not both' part of the premise, making it the impossible scenario.

Question 4

A focus group report includes the following statements: 1. Participants who value sustainability are more likely to prefer Product A. 2. Participants from urban areas tend to value sustainability more than those from rural areas. 3. Product A is selling better in rural areas than in urban areas. Which of the following is the most logical inference from these statements?

Accepted Answer

There must be another significant factor driving sales of Product A in rural areas.

Answer

There is a contradiction in the premises. We expect Product A to sell well in urban areas (where sustainability is valued) but it's actually selling better in rural areas. This suggests that the preference for sustainability is not the primary driver of sales in the rural market. Therefore, some other factor must be influencing its success there, overriding the stated value preference.

Question 5

Which of the following is the most significant assumption made in the argument: 'Our competitor lowered their prices last quarter and their sales volume increased. Therefore, we should lower our prices to increase our sales volume.'?

Accepted Answer

The competitor's price drop was the sole cause of their sales increase.

Answer

The argument observes a correlation (price drop and sales increase) and concludes causation. The critical assumption is that the price drop was the only reason for the sales increase. It ignores other potential factors like a successful marketing campaign by the competitor, a decrease in quality from another competitor, or seasonal trends. The other options are potential outcomes or related facts, but not the core assumption of the argument itself.

HBRI - Hogan Business Reasoning Inventory Practice Test

HBRI - Hogan Business Reasoning Inventory Practice Test

HBRI - Hogan Business Reasoning Inventory Qualitative Reasoning: Verbal Logic Questions and Answers