ELPAC - English Language Proficiency Assessments for California ELPAC Composite Scores Questions and Answers

Question 1

Which two domains are combined to calculate a student's Written Language composite score on both the Initial and Summative ELPAC?

Accepted Answer

Reading and Writing

Answer

The Written Language composite score is calculated from the Reading and Writing domains, reflecting a student's skills with written text. The Oral Language composite is calculated from the Listening and Speaking domains.

Question 2

A Local Educational Agency (LEA) is reviewing a student's Summative ELPAC results as the first criterion for reclassification. According to California Department of Education guidelines, which score and performance level make a student eligible for consideration?

Accepted Answer

Overall Performance Level 4

Answer

The primary indicator for reclassification eligibility is achieving an Overall Performance Level of 4 on the Summative ELPAC. This score demonstrates a high level of English proficiency across all four domains, which is the first step in the multi-criteria reclassification process.

Question 3

For students in grades 2-12, how are the Oral Language and Written Language composite scores weighted to determine the Overall composite score on the Summative ELPAC?

Accepted Answer

50% Oral Language and 50% Written Language

Answer

For grades two through twelve, the Overall score on the Summative ELPAC is calculated with an equal weighting: 50% from the Oral Language composite score (Listening and Speaking) and 50% from the Written Language composite score (Reading and Writing).

Question 4

A third-grade student's Summative ELPAC report shows an Overall Performance Level of 3. What does this level, 'Moderately Developed,' generally indicate about the student's English skills?

Accepted Answer

The student has moderately developed skills and can sometimes use English to learn and interact but may need support on less-familiar topics.

Answer

An Overall Performance Level of 3, or 'Moderately Developed,' indicates that a student can sometimes use English for academic and social purposes but may require linguistic support when encountering less-familiar topics or situations. It represents a midpoint in the journey to full English proficiency.

Question 5

A school data team is analyzing a student's score report and notes a significant discrepancy between the Oral Language composite and the Written Language composite. Which of the following is the most accurate interpretation of this score profile?

Accepted Answer

It provides targeted information on which set of skills (spoken vs. written) may require more instructional support.

Answer

The purpose of providing separate Oral Language (Listening/Speaking) and Written Language (Reading/Writing) composite scores is to help educators identify specific areas of strength and weakness. A discrepancy between these scores is valuable data for targeting instruction to support the student's needs in either their spoken or written English skills.

(ELPAC) English Language Proficiency Assessments for California Practice Test Practice Test

(ELPAC) English Language Proficiency Assessments for California Practice Test Practice Test

ELPAC - English Language Proficiency Assessments for California ELPAC Composite Scores Questions and Answers