LAPD - Los Angeles Police Department Background Investigation Standards Questions and Answers

Question 1

During the LAPD background investigation, a candidate admits to occasional marijuana use several years ago, prior to it being legal for recreational use, but has not used any illegal substances in the last three years. How is this information most likely to be evaluated?

Accepted Answer

The investigator will evaluate the recency, frequency, and circumstances of the use as part of the 'whole person' assessment.

Answer

The LAPD evaluates past drug use on a case-by-case basis, considering the 'whole person'. Key factors include the type of substance, frequency of use, and time elapsed since last use. While hard drug use is often disqualifying, past marijuana use, especially if not recent or frequent, is evaluated within the broader context of the candidate's life and choices. Absolute honesty about past use is critical.

Question 2

Which of the following is an automatic and permanent disqualifier for any applicant to the Los Angeles Police Department?

Accepted Answer

A felony conviction as an adult.

Answer

A felony conviction is an automatic and permanent disqualifier for becoming a police officer with the LAPD and other law enforcement agencies. While financial issues, employment history, and driving records are scrutinized heavily and can lead to disqualification, they are typically evaluated on a case-by-case basis, whereas a felony conviction legally bars an individual from holding the position.

Question 3

An LAPD applicant was terminated from a job five years ago for a policy violation. On the Personal History Statement, the applicant intentionally lists the reason for leaving as 'laid off' to avoid a negative perception. During the field investigation, the truth is discovered. What is the most likely outcome?

Accepted Answer

The applicant will be disqualified for dishonesty and lack of integrity.

Answer

Honesty, integrity, and being forthcoming during the selection process are paramount standards for the LAPD. Deliberately falsifying information or omitting key facts on an application is considered a serious integrity violation. Often, the act of dishonesty itself is more disqualifying than the original event the candidate was trying to hide.

Question 4

A candidate for the LAPD has a significant amount of student loan and credit card debt, resulting in a low credit score. However, they have never missed a payment and have a clear budget plan they are following. How will a background investigator most likely view this situation?

Accepted Answer

Positively, as it demonstrates financial responsibility and maturity despite the debt.

Answer

LAPD background investigators look for a pattern of financial irresponsibility, such as late payments or accounts in collections, not just the existence of debt. A candidate who manages their debt responsibly, lives within their means, and meets their obligations demonstrates the maturity and discipline the department values. The focus is on fiscal responsibility, not being debt-free.

Question 5

Which of the following best describes the LAPD's standard regarding a candidate's driving history?

Accepted Answer

A candidate's driving record is reviewed as an indicator of their judgment and respect for the law.

Answer

The LAPD views a candidate's driving record as a reflection of their overall judgment, maturity, and willingness to obey laws and regulations. While a single ticket is unlikely to be an issue, a pattern of moving violations, at-fault accidents, or license suspensions can indicate poor judgment or a disregard for public safety, which are disqualifying traits.

(LAPD) Los Angeles Police Department Practice Test

(LAPD) Los Angeles Police Department Practice Test

LAPD - Los Angeles Police Department Background Investigation Standards Questions and Answers