JD Evidence

Question 1

Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, which of the following statements best defines hearsay?

Accepted Answer

Any out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted

Answer

FRE 801 defines hearsay as an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, regardless of who made it.

Question 2

Which of the following is NOT an exception to the hearsay rule under FRE 803?

Accepted Answer

Prior inconsistent statement of a witness

Answer

Prior inconsistent statements of a witness are governed by FRE 801(d)(1), not FRE 803; FRE 803 lists exceptions that apply regardless of declarant availability.

Question 3

Under FRE 404(b), evidence of prior bad acts is admissible for which purpose?

Accepted Answer

To prove intent, knowledge, or absence of mistake

Answer

FRE 404(b) permits other-acts evidence for non-propensity purposes such as proving intent, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake.

Question 4

The attorney-client privilege protects communications that are made:

Accepted Answer

Confidentially between a client and their attorney for the purpose of obtaining legal advice

Answer

The attorney-client privilege applies to confidential communications between a client and their attorney made for the purpose of seeking or giving legal advice.

Question 5

Under FRE 602, a witness may testify only if:

Accepted Answer

The witness has personal knowledge of the matter

Answer

FRE 602 requires that a lay witness have personal knowledge of the matter about which they testify, established by evidence sufficient to support a finding.

JD - Juris Doctor or a Doctor of Jurisprudence Practice Test

JD - Juris Doctor or a Doctor of Jurisprudence Practice Test

JD Evidence