The GMAT (Graduate Management Admission Test) is the leading standardized test for business school admissions, accepted by over 7,700 business programs at 2,400+ institutions worldwide. Administered by the Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC), the GMAT assesses the analytical, verbal, quantitative, and data reasoning skills that business schools consider essential for MBA-level study.
In November 2023, GMAC introduced the practice tests Edition — a streamlined, shorter version of the exam replacing the previous full GMAT. The GMAT Focus Edition is approximately 2 hours 15 minutes (excluding breaks), compared to the previous GMAT's 3 hours 7 minutes. The revised format has been widely adopted by business schools and is now the standard version of the GMAT.
Notable changes in the GMAT Focus Edition: the Analytical Writing Assessment (AWA) essay has been eliminated; the Sentence Correction question type has been removed from Verbal; and a new Data Insights section has been added, consolidating data analysis skills previously spread across multiple sections. These changes better align the exam with skills relevant to modern business analytics roles.
The GMAT Focus Edition consists of three sections, each contributing equally to your total score:
Quantitative Reasoning (45 minutes, 21 questions): Problem Solving questions only — the Data Sufficiency format has moved to the Data Insights section. Tests arithmetic, algebra, geometry, word problems, and number properties. The Quantitative section does not permit a calculator, requiring mental math and estimation skills. Difficulty ranges from straightforward arithmetic to complex multi-step algebraic reasoning. The key change from the previous GMAT: no Data Sufficiency questions in this section.
Verbal Reasoning (45 minutes, 23 questions): Reading Comprehension and Critical Reasoning questions only — Sentence Correction has been eliminated. Reading Comprehension passages require inference, main idea analysis, and structural understanding of academic and business texts. Critical Reasoning tests your ability to identify assumptions, strengthen or weaken arguments, and evaluate evidence. The elimination of Sentence Correction has made Verbal more reasoning-focused than grammar-focused.
Data Insights (45 minutes, 20 questions): A new section combining multiple question types: Data Sufficiency (moved from Quantitative), Multi-Source Reasoning, Table Analysis, Graphics Interpretation, and Two-Part Analysis. This section tests integrated reasoning with quantitative and verbal skills, business data literacy, and logical reasoning — skills directly relevant to data-driven business decision-making.
Prepare for the GMAT - Graduate Management Admission Test exam with our free practice test modules. Each quiz covers key topics to help you pass on your first try.
The GMAT Focus Edition scores range from 205 to 805, in 10-point increments. Each of the three sections (Quantitative, Verbal, Data Insights) is scored from 60 to 90, and the total score is derived from a combination of all three section scores.
Average and competitive scores:
Section score interpretation: Each section is scored from 60–90. Strong Quantitative scores (80+) are particularly valued by finance and analytics-focused programs. Verbal scores (80+) are critical for admission essay quality assessment and for programs emphasizing communication skills. Data Insights scores (80+) are increasingly valued as business analytics skills become central to MBA curriculum requirements.
Score conversion from old GMAT: If you have an older GMAT score, GMAC provides an official conversion tool to approximate the equivalent GMAT Focus Edition score. Old scores of 700+ typically convert to GMAT Focus Edition equivalents of approximately 655–695, though conversion is approximate.
Without Data Sufficiency in the Quantitative section, the GMAT Focus Edition Quantitative section now tests pure problem-solving ability across arithmetic, algebra, and geometry.
With Sentence Correction eliminated, GMAT Verbal now focuses entirely on reasoning and comprehension — two skills that are harder to improve quickly but more broadly applicable to business performance.
Data Insights is the newest and most distinctive section of the GMAT Focus Edition. It combines five question types that require both quantitative and verbal reasoning applied to business data.
The right online courses with certificatesaration timeline depends on your starting score and target score. Here is a framework for common preparation scenarios:
Starting score 600+, target 700+ (100+ point improvement): Plan for 3–4 months of preparation, studying 10–15 hours per week. Focus first on your weakest section. Quantitative and Data Insights improvement requires methodical error analysis — not just more practice questions. Master the concepts behind every type of question you miss before attempting more of that question type.
Starting score 550–600, target 650–680 (50–80 point improvement): 2–3 months of preparation, 10 hours per week. Focus on foundational Quantitative skills (arithmetic, algebra) and Critical Reasoning — both reward systematic study more than other skills. Use official GMAC practice tests to calibrate your actual readiness before booking your exam date.
Starting score above 680, targeting 720+: Typically 6–10 weeks of intensive preparation focused on harder problem types. At this level, improvement comes from mastering the concepts behind the hardest 20–25% of questions in each section. Use advanced GMAT prep resources (Manhattan GMAT Advanced Quant, Target Test Prep) that focus on high-difficulty question types.
Study schedule framework: Week 1 — diagnostic exam and section baseline identification. Weeks 2–8 — structured content review by section, 75–100 practice questions per week with full rationale review. Every 2 weeks — take a full official practice test to track progress. Final 2 weeks — simulation (full timed exams) and review of persistent error patterns.
Most MBA programs accept both the GMAT Focus Edition and the GRE, making the choice a strategic one based on your profile and target schools.
Why choose the GMAT: The GMAT is the traditional business school exam and may be viewed more favorably at programs where it carries historical prestige (e.g., Harvard Business School, Wharton). If you excel at the Data Sufficiency question format — which is unique to the GMAT — and have strong quantitative skills, the GMAT may suit you better. GMAT scores are submitted with all retakes visible (though you can select which scores to send under Enhanced Score Report options), so strategic test-taking is important.
Why choose the GRE: The GRE is accepted at virtually all MBA programs and offers ScoreSelect, allowing you to send only your best scores. The GRE does not have Data Sufficiency questions and has a different Verbal format (Text Completion, Sentence Equivalence) that some candidates find more intuitive. The GRE is also required for non-business graduate programs, making it more flexible if you are considering multiple graduate program types.
How to decide: Take official free practice tests for both exams and convert your scores to compare. GMAC provides a GMAT-to-GRE score comparison tool. If your scores are comparable, choose based on which format's question types feel more natural and which exam your primary target schools prefer. If one score is significantly higher, choose that exam.
The GMAT prep market includes a wide range of resources, and not all are created equal. Here is an honest assessment of the most effective preparation tools for the GMAT Focus Edition:
Official GMAC materials (essential for everyone): GMAC publishes official GMAT Focus Edition practice exams and question banks at mba.com. The official practice exams are the gold standard for score prediction and test familiarization — no third-party resource accurately replicates the exact difficulty calibration of the real exam. Complete all official materials, but do not use them early in your preparation, as you want their novelty preserved for later practice.
Target Test Prep (TTP) — best for Quantitative: TTP is widely considered the best online resource for GMAT Quantitative preparation. Its structured, concept-by-concept approach is particularly effective for test-takers who need to rebuild math foundations from the ground up. TTP covers every Quantitative concept in detail with practice problems at multiple difficulty levels. It is a paid resource (monthly subscription) but has a strong track record of producing score improvements.
Manhattan GMAT / Kaplan — comprehensive programs: Both offer full preparation programs covering all sections with structured content review, strategy lessons, and practice questions. Manhattan GMAT's Advanced Quant guide is particularly valued for candidates targeting 700+ who want exposure to the hardest quantitative problem types.
GMAT Club: The free GMAT Club forum is an invaluable community resource. High-quality explanations for thousands of practice problems are available in the forum, often explained by multiple members from different angles. The GMAT Club diagnostic test and question bank are also free and widely used. For candidates on a tight budget, GMAT Club plus official GMAC materials can provide most of the practice needed to prepare effectively.
Magoosh GMAT: An affordable self-paced online program with video lessons and practice questions. Well-suited for candidates who learn effectively from video instruction and need a flexible, lower-cost alternative to full prep courses. Magoosh's score improvement guarantee reflects confidence in their program effectiveness.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Structured GMAT study guides organize all required content in exam-aligned order, reducing time spent identifying what to study | Study guides can become outdated quickly when exam content is updated; verify edition currency before purchasing |
| Combining review guides with practice questions provides both content knowledge and test-taking fluency | Self-study requires self-discipline; candidates without structured external accountability often underallocate preparation time |
| Focused study plans allow candidates to allocate more time to weak areas rather than reviewing already-mastered content | Coverage breadth in comprehensive guides can create false confidence — recognizing content is not the same as answering questions correctly under timed conditions |
Try these questions from our free GMAT practice tests. The correct answer and an explanation follow each question.
In a school of 200 students, 80 study French, 70 study Spanish, and 30 study both. How many study neither?
Answer: A. 50
|F∪S| = 80 + 70 − 30 = 120. Neither = 200 − 120 = 80. Wait: 200 − 120 = 80. Answer is C.
A weighted average is calculated for three exam scores: Exam 1 (weight 20%) = 70, Exam 2 (weight 30%) = 80, Exam 3 (weight 50%) = 90. What is the weighted mean?
Answer: B. 83
Weighted mean = 0.2(70) + 0.3(80) + 0.5(90) = 14 + 24 + 45 = 83.
A study found that people who regularly drink at least one cup of green tea daily have a lower incidence of heart disease than people who do not. The study's authors concluded that the compounds in green tea are directly responsible for a reduced risk of heart disease.
Answer: C. Individuals who regularly drink green tea are also significantly more likely to engage in other healthy lifestyle behaviors, such as regular exercise and a balanced diet.
This statement weakens the argument by introducing a potential alternative cause for the observed outcome. If green tea drinkers are also more likely to exercise and eat well, then these other behaviors, rather than the green tea itself, could be the reason for their lower incidence of heart disease. This breaks the direct causal link the author asserts between green tea and heart health, which is a classic correlation vs. causation flaw.
A study found that people who regularly own pets have, on average, lower blood pressure than people who do not. The study's authors concluded that acquiring a pet is an effective therapeutic strategy for lowering one's blood pressure. Which of the following is an assumption on which this conclusion depends?
Answer: B. People with naturally low blood pressure are not inherently more likely to own pets than people with high blood pressure.
The argument moves from a correlation (pet ownership and lower blood pressure) to a causal conclusion (getting a pet *causes* lower blood pressure). This assumes there isn't a reverse causality or a third factor causing both. The correct answer addresses the possibility of reverse causality. If people who already have low blood pressure are, for some reason, more likely to get pets in the first place, then the observed correlation wouldn't mean that pets lower blood pressure. The argument must assume this is not the case. Negating the assumption—that people with low blood pressure *are* more likely to get pets—would severely weaken the conclusion that getting a pet is a therapeutic strategy.