Situational Judgement: Ethics Flashcards
7 cards from real GGST practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Situational Judgement: Ethics flashcards as text
You discover a colleague has been inflating expense reports by small amounts over several months. The colleague is well-liked and nearing retirement. What is the most appropriate action?
Answer: Report the behavior to your supervisor or ethics office regardless of the colleague's circumstances
Expense fraud must be reported through proper channels regardless of the amount or the perpetrator's personal circumstances.
Your supervisor instructs you to backdate a document to make a missed deadline appear met. What should you do?
Answer: Refuse and explain that falsifying records violates organizational integrity standards
Falsifying official records is unethical and potentially illegal; you must refuse even when directed by a supervisor.
A vendor offers your team free tickets to a sporting event as a 'thank you' after your organization awarded them a contract. What is the best course of action?
Answer: Decline the gift and report the offer to your ethics or compliance office
Post-award gifts from vendors can still create conflicts of interest and must be declined and reported per standard gift policies.
You overhear two colleagues sharing confidential personnel information about a third employee in a public area. What should you do?
Answer: Remind the colleagues that personnel information is confidential and should not be discussed in public
You have a responsibility to uphold confidentiality norms by reminding colleagues of proper information-handling practices.
You are reviewing applications and notice the top candidate shares the same alma mater as you. You feel a slight preference for them. What is the ethical approach?
Answer: Acknowledge the potential bias, set it aside, and evaluate all candidates solely on merit-based criteria
Recognizing and actively counteracting personal bias while continuing to evaluate candidates on objective criteria is the appropriate ethical response.
A colleague asks you to sign off on work you did not review, saying 'it's just a formality.' What should you do?
Answer: Decline to sign until you have personally reviewed the work as your signature implies accountability
Your signature certifies your personal review and accountability; signing without reviewing is dishonest.
You learn that your organization is about to publish data you believe contains a significant error that could mislead decision-makers. What is the right course of action?
Answer: Raise your concern immediately with the responsible team or supervisor before publication
Integrity requires raising data accuracy concerns before publication so errors can be corrected through proper channels.
How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy
Sources & references
Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy
- learning.unog.ch — Test delivery, eligibility, exam format · verified Oct 2026