← All GGST Flashcard Decks

Situational Judgement: Ethics Flashcards

6 cards from real GGST practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 6 Situational Judgement: Ethics flashcards as text
  1. A staff member is part of a procurement committee selecting a vendor for a new IT system. Their cousin is a senior manager at one of the bidding companies. What is the most appropriate first step for the staff member to take?

    Answer: Disclose the potential conflict of interest to the committee chair or their supervisor.

    UN ethical standards require staff to avoid any situation that may create a real or apparent conflict of interest. The first and most critical step is transparency. Disclosing the relationship to a supervisor allows the Organization to take appropriate action, which may include recusing the staff member from the process, thereby protecting the integrity of the procurement process and the staff member.

  2. A staff member is working late to finish an urgent report. They realize they need to print a 100-page personal document for a university course they are taking. The office printer is available and has plenty of paper. What is the most ethical course of action?

    Answer: Refrain from using the office printer and find an external printing service for their personal document.

    UN resources, including equipment, supplies, and time, are to be used for official purposes only. While some policies may allow for limited personal use with negligible cost, printing a 100-page document does not fall into this category. The most ethical action is to separate personal activities from official duties and resources completely.

  3. During a casual lunch with friends who do not work for the UN, a staff member is asked about a sensitive negotiation they are involved in. The details have not been made public. How should the staff member respond?

    Answer: Politely decline to discuss the matter, explaining that the information is confidential.

    UN staff members have a duty to exercise the utmost discretion with regard to all matters of official business. They must not share confidential information obtained through their duties. The most professional and ethical response is to clearly and politely state that the information cannot be shared, upholding the principle of confidentiality without being rude.

  4. A representative from a local partner organization, with whom a UN staff member has worked closely on a successful project, offers the staff member an expensive, handcrafted gift as a token of personal appreciation. According to UN ethical guidelines, what is the most appropriate action?

    Answer: Politely decline the gift, explaining that UN regulations prohibit the acceptance of such gifts from partners.

    To avoid any real or apparent conflict of interest, UN staff members are prohibited from accepting gifts from persons or entities doing business with the UN. Accepting a gift could compromise, or appear to compromise, the staff member's independence and impartiality. The correct action is to politely decline and explain the policy to maintain professional integrity and avoid any perception of being influenced.

  5. A staff member strongly disagrees with a recent public statement made by a senior UN official. They consider posting a critical and strongly worded opinion on their personal social media account, which lists their UN affiliation. Which of the following is the most ethically sound course of action?

    Answer: Use appropriate internal channels to express their disagreement rather than public social media.

    While staff members' personal views are inviolable, they must ensure their conduct does not adversely affect the interests of the United Nations. Publicly criticizing the Organization can undermine its work and reputation. Even with a disclaimer, a public post can reflect poorly on their status as an international civil servant. The appropriate course of action is to use established internal mechanisms for feedback or dissent.

  6. A hiring manager is reviewing applications for a junior position. They notice an application from a candidate who is a close friend of a senior director in a different department. The candidate meets the minimum qualifications, but there are other, more qualified applicants. What is the most ethical action for the hiring manager to take?

    Answer: Evaluate the application solely based on the established merit-based criteria against all other candidates.

    The core principle of UN recruitment is to secure the highest standards of efficiency, competence, and integrity through a fair, transparent, and merit-based process. The hiring manager must remain impartial and evaluate all candidates strictly on their qualifications and suitability for the role. Allowing personal connections to influence the decision, even to shortlist for an interview, compromises the integrity of the process.

How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy

Sources & references

Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy

  1. learning.unog.ch — Test delivery, eligibility, exam format · verified Oct 2026