General Surgery Board Review Communication & Stakeholder Relations 4 β Questions and Answers
Question 1: A surgeon receives a gift of significant monetary value from a grateful patient. The most ethically appropriate response is to:
- Accept the gift graciously to honor the patient relationship
- Decline the gift and explain the professional boundary (Correct answer)
- Accept it on behalf of the department and donate it collectively
- Report the offer to hospital administration before deciding
Correct answer: Decline the gift and explain the professional boundary
Accepting gifts of significant value from patients can compromise objectivity and violates professional boundaries outlined by most medical ethics codes.
Question 2: A patient undergoing workup for colorectal cancer asks the surgeon not to discuss findings with their spouse, who is present at the appointment. The surgeon should:
- Explain to the spouse that they have a right to know
- Honor the patient's request and conduct the discussion privately (Correct answer)
- Ask the patient to reconsider for the sake of family support
- Notify the spouse indirectly through written correspondence
Correct answer: Honor the patient's request and conduct the discussion privately
Patient confidentiality must be maintained regardless of family presence; the patient controls who receives their health information.
Question 3: A chief resident is completing an operative note and realizes the attending inadvertently documented the wrong procedure. The most appropriate action is to:
- Correct the note silently to protect the attending's reputation
- Notify the attending immediately so they can issue an addendum (Correct answer)
- File a formal incident report without informing the attending
- Leave the error for the attending to discover independently
Correct answer: Notify the attending immediately so they can issue an addendum
Documentation errors must be corrected promptly through an addendum with a date/time stamp; alerting the responsible physician is the professional and safe course.
Question 4: When breaking bad news to a patient about a new cancer diagnosis, which communication framework is most evidence-based for surgical oncology settings?
- SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan)
- SPIKES (Setting, Perception, Invitation, Knowledge, Emotions, Summary) (Correct answer)
- SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation)
- PDSA (Plan, Do, Study, Act)
Correct answer: SPIKES (Setting, Perception, Invitation, Knowledge, Emotions, Summary)
The SPIKES protocol is the validated six-step framework specifically designed to guide clinicians through delivering serious news to patients.
Question 5: A surgical attending is asked by a pharmaceutical representative to speak at a sponsored dinner promoting a new hemostatic agent. The most important initial step is to:
- Decline all industry engagements to maintain objectivity
- Disclose the financial relationship to your institution and follow its conflict-of-interest policy (Correct answer)
- Accept if the science supports the product
- Consult a malpractice attorney before agreeing
Correct answer: Disclose the financial relationship to your institution and follow its conflict-of-interest policy
Institutional conflict-of-interest policies govern industry relationships; compliance requires disclosure and often pre-approval regardless of personal integrity.
Question 6: During a handoff at shift change, which approach best reduces communication failures and adverse events?
- Verbal summary only to save time
- Structured verbal and written handoff using a standardized tool (e.g., I-PASS) (Correct answer)
- Relying on the chart for all information transfer
- Email summary sent after the shift ends
Correct answer: Structured verbal and written handoff using a standardized tool (e.g., I-PASS)
I-PASS and similar structured handoff tools reduce adverse events and communication failures compared to unstructured verbal or chart-only transitions.
Question 7: A patient who signed consent for a laparoscopic appendectomy wakes up to find they also had an incidental cholecystectomy performed. Ethically and legally, this represents:
- Acceptable scope expansion if the surgeon judged it beneficial
- Battery, as consent was not obtained for the additional procedure (Correct answer)
- A best-practice extension of care under the doctrine of necessity
- A minor deviation requiring only documentation
Correct answer: Battery, as consent was not obtained for the additional procedure
Performing a procedure for which no consent was obtained constitutes battery unless a true emergency existed; incidental finding does not justify unconsented surgery.
A surgeon receives a gift of significant monetary value from a grateful patient.
The most ethically appropriate response is to: