A customer insists their car damage was caused by a covered peril, but photos show evidence it was caused by normal wear and tear. How should you handle this?
-
A
Approve the claim to avoid conflict with the customer
-
B
Explain clearly why the damage appears to be wear and tear, which is not a covered peril, and offer to escalate for a second opinion
-
C
Deny the claim without any explanation
-
D
Ask the customer to provide their own photos to contradict the evidence