FREE JIBC Basic Security Training Questions and Answers
Why should security guards be familiar with common bylaws?
Explanation:
Security guards need to be familiar with common bylaws because they will regularly encounter situations where knowledge of bylaws will be necessary. Being familiar with bylaws will also help them know where to locate specific information when needed. Option B and C are incorrect because they do not provide a valid reason for why security guards should be familiar with bylaws. Option D is incorrect because it combines both correct and incorrect reasons, making it an incorrect choice. Therefore, option A is the best answer as it provides a clear and valid explanation for why security guards should be familiar with common bylaws.
What emergency situations could occur to a security guard while working on site?
Explanation:
Small fires - While it is true that small fires could occur at any time while a security guard is working on site, it is not the only type of emergency situation they may encounter. In order to be fully prepared, a security guard should also be trained and knowledgeable about how to handle other types of emergencies.
Major disasters - While major disasters may be the most extreme type of emergency situation, they are also less common than other types of emergencies. A security guard should have a plan in place to handle these situations, but it is not the only kind of emergency they might encounter.
Hazards both Natural or Man Made - This option is partially correct, as it covers both natural and man-made hazards. However, it does not specify the severity of the hazards that a security guard could encounter. By choosing this option, one could argue that not all emergency situations are covered.
When using a fire extinguisher a simple way is to learn the PASS system. PASS stands for:
Explanation:
When using a fire extinguisher, the PASS system is an easy way to remember the steps. It stands for Pull the pin, Aim at the base of the fire, Squeeze the handle, and Sweep from side to side until the fire is out. Option B is incorrect because it replaces "pin" with "arm". Option C is incorrect because it replaces "pin" with "alarm", which does not pertain to the steps of operating a fire extinguisher. Option D is incorrect because there is a correct answer, the PASS system described in A.
What can security personnel be exposed to in terms of workplace violence?
Explanation:
Security personnel can be exposed to a variety of workplace violence, including angry customers and clients, harassment and threats, and suspicious packages. These are all potential sources of violence that security personnel may come into contact with while on duty. Therefore, the correct answer is "All of the above."
Which of the following is a definition of continuity of evidence?
Explanation:
Continuity of evidence refers to the unbroken chain of custody and control of an object, which protects its integrity and ensures that it can be used as evidence in a legal proceeding. Option A is incorrect because continuity of evidence is not solely controlled by the police service; it involves multiple parties in the custody chain. Option C is also incorrect because the continuity of evidence can be controlled by multiple individuals, as long as there is a clear record of custody and control. Option D is incorrect because although evidence should be presented in a proper sequence, this is not the definition of continuity of evidence.
How do you put out a Class C fire?
Explanation:
Class C fires involve energized electrical equipment such as appliances, motors, or transformers. Covering the fire with water or foam could potentially cause electrocution and further spread the fire. Gas should never be used to put out a fire as it is highly flammable and can cause the fire to become larger. Baking soda, on the other hand, is a non-flammable substance that can smother the oxygen from the fire, putting it out. Additionally, it will not cause any further harm to the electrical equipment.
What is the maximum penalty for an individual’s violation of the code of conduct?
Explanation:
The maximum penalty for an individual’s violation of the code of conduct is a $25,000.00 fine and/or a year in jail. This is the most severe punishment among the given choices as it involves both a high monetary consequence and potential imprisonment. Options A and B have lower fines and do not involve jail time, which suggests a lesser offense. Option D only mentions potential consequences for the offender's license, whereas option C addresses both monetary and criminal consequences.
People under the influence of drugs and alcohol should be treated with:
Explanation:
People under the influence of drugs and alcohol can exhibit unpredictable and potentially dangerous behavior. Therefore, extreme caution is necessary when interacting with them to ensure the safety of both parties. Option A, moderate caution, may not be enough to handle a situation that could quickly escalate due to the individual's impaired judgement. Option B, ease, could be interpreted as being too relaxed and not taking necessary precautions. Option D, all of the above, is incorrect because while both A and C involve some level of caution, they are not equally appropriate in this situation. It is important to remember that the safety and well-being of everyone involved should be the top priority when dealing with an individual who is under the influence of drugs and alcohol.
What best describes Chain of Custody:
Explanation:
Chain of custody refers to the process of maintaining and documenting the handling of physical evidence from the time it is collected to the time it is presented in court. Option A, destruction of evidence, is incorrect because the goal of chain of custody is to preserve and maintain evidence. Option C, storing old evidence, is also incorrect because the chain of custody applies to all evidence, not just old evidence. Option D, a suspect taken into custody, is also incorrect as it does not accurately describe the process of chain of custody. The correct answer is B because it accurately describes the process of maintaining and documenting evidence to ensure its continuity and integrity.
Which of the following is not governed by the Employment Standards Act?
Explanation:
The Employment Standards Act governs the minimum standards for employment in Ontario, Canada. This includes regulations for hours of work and wages. Therefore, options A and B are incorrect as they are both governed by the Employment Standards Act. Option D is also incorrect, as it states "all of the above," which would include A and B, leading to an inconsistency. Option C, uniform, is not directly related to hours of work or wages and therefore is not governed by the Employment Standards Act.
You are security patrolling the environment when you see a patch of ice. What condition would you consider it?
Explanation:
“A potential condition” is the correct answer because a patch of ice presents a potential hazard that should be monitored and addressed to ensure safety.