English Language and Composition Exam AP English Language and Composition Argumentation 2

Question 1

Which rhetorical strategy involves acknowledging and then refuting an opposing viewpoint?

Accepted Answer

Concession and rebuttal

Answer

Concession and rebuttal strengthens an argument by showing the writer understands opposing views and can counter them.

Question 2

In argumentation, what is the primary purpose of a warrant?

Accepted Answer

To connect evidence to the claim by explaining the underlying assumption

Answer

A warrant is the logical link that explains why the evidence supports the claim, often an unstated assumption.

Question 3

A writer states: 'Studies show teens sleep-deprived; therefore, school should start later.' What is missing from this argument?

Accepted Answer

A warrant explaining why later start times address sleep deprivation

Answer

Without a warrant, the argument assumes—but does not prove—that changing start times will solve the sleep problem.

Question 4

Which of the following best describes a 'straw man' fallacy?

Accepted Answer

Misrepresenting an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack

Answer

A straw man fallacy distorts or exaggerates the opposing view so it can be more easily defeated.

Question 5

When a writer uses the phrase 'We must act now—every second of delay costs a child's future,' which appeal is most dominant?

Accepted Answer

Pathos

Answer

The urgent emotional language about children's futures is a pathos appeal designed to evoke fear and compassion.

English Language and Composition Exam Practice Test