Border Patrol Agent Practice Test

Question 1

Crimes are frequently classified as either malum in se-inherently evil-or malum prohibitum-criminal because they have been declared as so by a legislature. The former is exemplified by murder. The failure to file a tax return is an example of the latter. Although some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes 
of malum in se and crimes of malum prohibitum, others do not.

Accepted Answer

Some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes malum in se and malum prohibitum

Answer

The passage explicitly states, 'Although some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes of malum in se and crimes of malum prohibitum, others do not.' This sentence directly confirms that some jurisdictions continue to make this distinction, making option A the correct inference from the text.

Question 2

A trucking company can act as a common carrier-for contract to the common open at distributed rates. As a common carrier,  it is obligated for any cargo damage, unless the company can show that it was not negligent. On the off chance that the company can illustrate that it was not negligent, at that point it is not liable for cargo damage. In contrast, a contract carrier (a trucking company contracted by a shipper beneath a particular contract) is as it were dependable for cargo damage as spelled out within the contract. A  Claus Inc. tractor-trailer, acting beneath common carrier specialist, was in a 5-vehicle accident that damages its cargo. A Nichols Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under contract carrier authority, was included within the same accident and its cargo were also damaged.

Accepted Answer

If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is negligent.

Answer

The passage states that a common carrier, like Claus Inc., is not liable for cargo damage if it can show that it was not negligent. Option D, 'If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is negligent,' directly contradicts this information. If Claus Inc. proves non-negligence, it is by definition not negligent and thus not liable, making the statement in option D logically false according to the provided text.

Question 3

A Quickly changing technical environment is advancing greater dependence on electronic mail (mail) systems. As this utilization develops, there's expanding conflict between the users? desires of security and public access rights. In a few examinations, get to all mail, counting those messages put away in authentic records and messages exterior the scope of the examination, has been looked for and allowed. In show disdain toward this, a few people send messages through email that would never be said face-to-face or written formally.

Accepted Answer

Some e-mail messages that have been requested as part of investigations have contained messages that
would never be said face-to-face.

Answer

The passage indicates that access to email has been granted in investigations, and that people send messages via email they would never say face-to-face. Combining these two facts, it logically follows that some of the e-mail messages requested and accessed during investigations would contain content that individuals would not express in person. Option C directly synthesizes these two pieces of information.

Question 4

Phyllis T. could be a former Government representative who was entitled to benefits beneath the Government Employee Compensation Act since of job-related, impairing harm. When an eligible Government employee has such harm, the advantage is decided by this test: in case the recipient is hitched or 
has dependents, benefits are 3/4 of the people's compensation at the time of the harm; something else, benefits are set at 2/3 of the compensation. 
Phillis T.'s benefits were 2/3 of her compensation when she was injured.

Accepted Answer

was not married and had no dependents.

Answer

The passage clearly defines the benefit structure: 2/3 of compensation is given if the recipient is neither married nor has dependents. Since Phyllis T.'s benefits were 2/3 of her compensation, she must fall into this category. Therefore, she was not married and had no dependents.

Question 5

A few 480,000 immigrants were living in a certain nation in 1999. In spite of the fact that most of these immigrants were not utilized in proficient occupations, numerous of them were. For instance, numerous of them were engineers, and numerous of them were nurses. Exceptionally few of these workers were curators, another professional occupation.

Accepted Answer

Some of these engineers were immigrants.

Answer

The passage explicitly states that 'many of them [immigrants] were engineers.' This directly supports the conclusion that some of the engineers mentioned were indeed immigrants. Option D is a direct restatement of this fact, confirming a subset relationship.

CBP / BPA Practice Test

CBP / BPA Practice Test

Border Patrol Agent Practice Test