Performance Validity and Effort Indicators Flashcards
7 cards from real WAIS practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Performance Validity and Effort Indicators flashcards as text
Under the Slick, Sherman, and Iverson (1999) criteria, what is required for a diagnosis of malingered neurocognitive dysfunction?
Answer: A substantial external incentive together with evidence of response bias
The Slick criteria require a substantial external incentive plus evidence from testing or self-report that is not explained by psychiatric, neurological, or developmental factors.
Why does current guidance recommend giving several PVTs across an evaluation instead of just one?
Answer: Validity can change during testing, and failing two or more PVTs is more reliable than failing one
Effort can vary over a session, and failing two or more independent PVTs raises confidence that performance was invalid.
An examinee scores in the borderline range on Vocabulary but very low on Digit Span. Why might a Vocabulary minus Digit Span difference score be used as a validity indicator?
Answer: Vocabulary is usually stable after brain injury, while Digit Span is easy to suppress
Brain injury usually affects Vocabulary relatively little, so an unusually large gap where Digit Span is much lower may suggest suppressed effort.
Which population is most likely to fail PVTs at standard cutoffs even when giving genuine effort?
Answer: Patients with moderate-to-severe dementia
Severe genuine cognitive impairment, such as dementia, can lower PVT scores and lead to false positives.
When an examinee fails PVTs, how should the WAIS-IV ability scores generally be interpreted?
Answer: As likely underestimating true ability and not valid for interpretation
Noncredible effort lowers scores, so the obtained results probably underestimate the person's real abilities.
In medicolegal and disability evaluations, the base rate of probable malingering or symptom exaggeration reported by Mittenberg et al. (2002) was about:
Answer: Around 30%
Mittenberg and colleagues reported base rates of about 29–30% in personal injury and disability cases.
Which statement about PVT failure is most accurate?
Answer: It shows that the test results are not a valid reflection of ability, but intent must be judged separately
PVT failure shows invalid performance; deciding why (malingering, factitious disorder, or other causes) takes more clinical judgment.
How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy
Sources & references
Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy
- pearsonassessments.com — Test delivery, eligibility, fees, exam format, time limit, exam information · verified Nov 2026