← All WA BAR Flashcard Decks

Washington Civil Procedure Flashcards

6 cards from real WA BAR practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 6 Washington Civil Procedure flashcards as text
  1. Under Washington law, which doctrine allows a court to transfer venue when the chosen venue is not convenient?

    Answer: Forum non conveniens

    Washington courts apply the forum non conveniens doctrine under RCW 4.12.030 to transfer venue when the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be better served in another county.

  2. What is the standard of review applied by the Washington Court of Appeals to a superior court's grant of summary judgment?

    Answer: De novo

    The Washington Court of Appeals reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court.

  3. Under Washington's class action rule (CR 23), which element is NOT required for class certification?

    Answer: Predominance of individual issues

    Predominance of individual issues defeats, rather than supports, class certification; Washington CR 23 requires numerosity, commonality, typicality, and adequate representation.

  4. In Washington, what is the deadline for serving a complaint after filing to avoid dismissal?

    Answer: 90 days

    Under CR 4(m), a Washington plaintiff must serve the complaint within 90 days of filing or face dismissal without prejudice absent good cause.

  5. Under Washington CR 26, which of the following is automatically required to be disclosed without a formal discovery request?

    Answer: Identities of all potential witnesses known to the party

    Washington CR 26(b)(1) requires initial disclosure of the identity of each individual likely to have discoverable information, without awaiting a formal request.

  6. In Washington, which remedy is available when a party willfully destroys evidence after litigation is reasonably anticipated?

    Answer: Adverse inference instruction or dismissal as spoliation remedies

    Washington courts may impose an adverse inference jury instruction or dismissal as spoliation sanctions when a party willfully destroys evidence after litigation is reasonably foreseeable.

How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy

Sources & references

Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy

  1. ncbex.org — Test delivery, exam information · verified Nov 2026
  2. admissions.wsba.org — Exam dates, exam information · verified Oct 2026