← All VT BAR Flashcard Decks

VT Bar Evidence Flashcards

6 cards from real VT BAR practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 6 VT Bar Evidence flashcards as text
  1. Under the Federal Rules of Evidence (as adopted in Vermont), which hearsay exception covers excited utterances?

    Answer: FRE 803(2) — Excited utterance

    FRE 803(2) provides the excited utterance exception for statements made under the stress of excitement caused by a startling event.

  2. The best evidence rule (FRE 1002) generally requires which of the following to prove the contents of a document?

    Answer: The original document itself

    Under the best evidence rule, a party seeking to prove the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph must produce the original unless an exception applies.

  3. Under FRE 404(b), evidence of prior bad acts is inadmissible to prove character but may be admitted for which other purposes?

    Answer: Proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake

    FRE 404(b)(2) allows prior act evidence for purposes such as proving motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake — just not propensity.

  4. Which privilege protects confidential communications between an attorney and their client from compelled disclosure?

    Answer: Attorney-client privilege

    The attorney-client privilege protects confidential communications between a client and their attorney made for the purpose of obtaining legal advice.

  5. Under FRE 702, expert testimony is admissible if it satisfies which standard?

    Answer: The Daubert standard: the testimony is based on sufficient facts, reliable methods, reliably applied to the facts

    Under Daubert (as codified in FRE 702), expert testimony must be based on sufficient facts or data, use reliable principles and methods, and reliably apply those methods to the case facts.

  6. A statement made by a party opponent and offered against that party is classified as what under the Federal Rules?

    Answer: Non-hearsay under FRE 801(d)(2)

    Under FRE 801(d)(2), an opposing party's statement offered against them is defined as non-hearsay — it is excluded from the definition of hearsay entirely.

How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy

Sources & references

Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy

  1. vtcourts.gov — Test delivery, exam dates, exam format, passing score, registration deadline, eligibility, late registration, retake policy, score validity, exam information · verified Oct 2026