Consumer Protection Rules Flashcards
6 cards from real TICO practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 6 Consumer Protection Rules flashcards as text
A TICO-registered travel agent books an all-inclusive resort package for a consumer. Before finalizing the sale, the agent's supplier trade notes indicate the resort's main amenities building is under full renovation during the consumer's travel dates — but the agent does not mention this. The consumer later sues for misrepresentation. Under Ontario's consumer protection framework, what is the most accurate characterization of the agent's conduct?
Answer: It constitutes a material misrepresentation by omission, because the agent possessed information that would likely have affected the consumer's purchasing decision
Under Ontario's consumer protection principles and TICO standards, an agent who possesses material information — information that would reasonably influence a consumer's decision — has an affirmative duty to disclose it. Staying silent when you know something material is legally equivalent to making a false statement. The availability of trade notes means the agent 'knew or ought to have known,' making the omission actionable regardless of whether the consumer asked.
A consumer purchases a Caribbean cruise package through a TICO-registered agency and pays a $4,500 deposit. Seven months before departure, the agency unexpectedly ceases operations. The consumer then discovers the agency never remitted the deposit to the cruise line. Which statement best describes the consumer's recourse under TICO's Travel Compensation Fund (TCF)?
Answer: The consumer is fully covered up to $5,000 per person, since the loss arose directly from a TICO registrant ceasing to carry on business
The TICO Travel Compensation Fund exists precisely for this scenario: when a TICO-registered registrant ceases to carry on business and a consumer suffers a financial loss on prepaid travel services. The fact that the funds were never remitted to the supplier does not disqualify the claim — indeed, this is the most common form of TCF claim. Coverage applies per consumer up to the prescribed limit, and the consumer does not need to exhaust other remedies first.
Under the Ontario Travel Industry Act, 2002, a supplier notifies a TICO-registered agent that the total price of a consumer's confirmed package has increased by 9% due to fuel surcharge adjustments, 45 days before departure. What is the registrant's primary obligation to the consumer in this situation?
Answer: The registrant must notify the consumer of the increase; if the increase exceeds the prescribed threshold, the consumer has the right to cancel for a full refund
Ontario regulations require registrants to promptly notify consumers of supplier-initiated price increases. If the increase exceeds the threshold prescribed in regulation (7% of the total package price), the consumer has the right to cancel the booking and receive a full refund — even this close to departure. Simply including a general price-variation clause in the contract does not override the consumer's statutory right to cancel when the increase is material.
A TICO-registered wholesaler receives consumer funds from a retail travel agent for a group tour package departing in five months. The wholesaler has not yet remitted these funds to the tour operator. Which statement most accurately describes the wholesaler's trust account obligation under Ontario's Travel Industry Act, 2002?
Answer: The wholesaler must hold the funds in a designated trust account until the prescribed conditions for release — such as remittance to the supplier or confirmation of services — are satisfied
Ontario's Travel Industry Act, 2002 imposes independent trust account obligations on wholesalers. The retail agent's trust account satisfies obligations at the retail level, but once funds are transferred to the wholesaler, the wholesaler becomes responsible for holding them in trust until prescribed release conditions are met (e.g., remittance to the supplier, or confirmation that the supplier will provide the services). Commingling with operating funds at any point in the chain is prohibited.
A consumer books a European river cruise through a TICO-registered Ontario agent, paying in full. Three weeks before departure, the foreign river cruise operator — which is not TICO-registered — abruptly ceases operations due to insolvency. The consumer was stranded at home and never boarded. Which outcome most accurately reflects TICO's Travel Compensation Fund coverage in this scenario?
Answer: The TCF covers the consumer's prepaid travel costs because the booking was made through a TICO-registered agent, and the supplier's cessation of operations triggers TCF eligibility
TICO's Travel Compensation Fund covers Ontario consumers who suffer losses on prepaid travel services when either (a) the TICO registrant they booked through ceases to carry on business, OR (b) a travel supplier ceases to provide the services — provided the booking was made through a TICO-registered agent. The supplier's foreign status does not disqualify the claim; what matters is that the consumer's point of purchase was a TICO registrant. This is one of the Fund's most important — and often misunderstood — coverage scenarios.
A TICO-registered agent is aware that the Government of Canada has issued a 'Avoid Non-Essential Travel' advisory for the consumer's destination, issued two days after the consumer's contract was signed but four months before departure. The agent does not proactively inform the consumer, reasoning that government advisories are publicly available and it is the consumer's responsibility to monitor them. Under TICO's standards of practice, the agent's conduct is best described as:
Answer: A potential breach of the registrant's ongoing duty to inform, since material changes affecting the consumer's health or safety that arise post-contract must still be communicated
TICO's standards impose a continuing duty on registrants — not just a pre-sale duty. When a material development arises after the contract is signed that affects the safety or wellbeing of the consumer at their destination, the registrant has an obligation to promptly notify the consumer, regardless of whether the information is technically 'public.' A Government of Canada travel advisory is exactly the kind of material post-contract development that triggers this duty. Relying on a disclaimer clause to shift this duty entirely to the consumer does not eliminate the registrant's professional obligation.