Reading: Inference and Critical Analysis Flashcards
7 cards from real TEAS practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning β missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Reading: Inference and Critical Analysis flashcards as text
A writer argues a product is the best on the market, citing only reviews posted on the seller's own website. The main weakness in this reasoning is:
Answer: The evidence comes from a biased source
Reviews on the seller's own site are a biased source and cannot objectively prove the product is best.
Which sentence states an opinion rather than a fact?
Answer: The bridge is the most beautiful structure in the country
Calling the bridge the most beautiful is a subjective judgment, making it an opinion.
An author writes, "Critics claim the law failed, yet crime fell every year it was in effect." The author's purpose is most likely to:
Answer: Counter the critics with evidence
Presenting declining crime against the critics' claim is meant to counter them with evidence.
A passage's tone shifts from admiring a leader's vision to listing the projects he never finished. This shift suggests the author's overall attitude is:
Answer: Mixed or critical despite some praise
Praising vision but emphasizing unfinished work signals a mixed, ultimately critical attitude.
Which of the following is the best example of a logical conclusion drawn from evidence?
Answer: The lights are off and the door is locked, so the store is closed
Lights off and a locked door reasonably support the conclusion that the store is closed.
An author repeatedly uses words like "shocking," "disastrous," and "alarming" to describe a policy. This word choice reveals the author's:
Answer: Strong negative bias
Emotionally charged negative words reveal the author's strong bias against the policy.
A study found that students who ate breakfast scored higher on tests. A flawed conclusion would be:
Answer: Eating breakfast guarantees high test scores
Claiming breakfast guarantees high scores overstates a correlation as if it were proven causation.