← All Series 66 – Uniform Combined State Law Exam Flashcard Decks

Legal Research & Case Analysis Flashcards

7 cards from real Series 66 – Uniform Combined State Law Exam practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Legal Research & Case Analysis flashcards as text
  1. Under SEC v. W.J. Howey Co., which of the following is NOT an element of an investment contract?

    Answer: A written certificate evidencing ownership

    Howey looks at economic reality, so no formal certificate is required for an investment contract.

  2. In Reves v. Ernst & Young, the Supreme Court used which approach to decide whether a note is a security?

    Answer: The family resemblance test, beginning with a presumption that notes are securities

    Reves presumes notes are securities and rebuts that presumption only if the note resembles a judicially listed non-security category.

  3. In Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth, the Court held that the sale of 100% of a closely held business's stock:

    Answer: Is covered by the securities laws because the instrument is stock

    Landreth rejected the sale of business doctrine, so stock is a security even when control passes.

  4. Marine Bank v. Weaver held that a certificate of deposit issued by a federally regulated bank is:

    Answer: Not a security because of the regulatory protections already in place

    Federal banking regulation and deposit insurance made the securities laws' protections unnecessary for the CD.

  5. United Housing Foundation v. Forman held that shares in a cooperative housing project were not securities because purchasers:

    Answer: Were motivated by acquiring housing to use, not by profit

    Buyers wanted residences, not an expectation of profit, so Howey was not satisfied despite the label 'stock.'

  6. In SEC v. Edwards, the Court addressed investment contracts offering fixed returns and concluded that:

    Answer: Fixed returns can still satisfy the profit expectation element

    Edwards held that a promised fixed return is still an expectation of profit under Howey.

  7. SEC v. C.M. Joiner Leasing Corp. is cited for the principle that an instrument:

    Answer: Can be a security if, in practice, it is offered as an investment scheme, even when the underlying asset is real property

    Joiner found oil lease assignments were securities because of how they were promoted as an investment.

How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy

Sources & references

Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy

  1. nasaa.org — Test delivery, fees, renewal, score release, test dates, exam information · verified Nov 2026
  2. finra.org — Eligibility, exam format, passing score, time limit · verified Oct 2026