SAIWA Use of Force and Physical Intervention 2

Question 1

Which factor most influences the level of force a security agent may lawfully apply?

Accepted Answer

The seriousness and immediacy of the threat presented

Answer

The seriousness and immediacy of the threat directly determines what level of force is proportionate and therefore lawful.

Question 2

A security agent can use force in self-defence only if:

Accepted Answer

The threat is imminent and they use no more force than is reasonably necessary

Answer

Self-defence requires that the threat be imminent and the force used be reasonably necessary — past verbal threats alone do not justify force.

Question 3

Which of the following is an example of a non-physical de-escalation technique?

Accepted Answer

Using a firm, calm tone and active listening to reduce tension

Answer

Using a calm, authoritative tone combined with active listening is a recognised verbal technique for de-escalating tense situations.

Question 4

In WA security industry practice, 'proportional force' means:

Accepted Answer

Matching the level of force to the level of resistance or danger

Answer

Proportional force means the response must be calibrated to match the threat — greater threats may justify greater force, but force must never exceed what is necessary.

Question 5

A security agent witnesses a colleague using clearly excessive force on a detained person. The correct action is to:

Accepted Answer

Intervene to stop the excessive force and report the incident to a supervisor

Answer

Security agents have a duty to prevent unlawful conduct by colleagues; failing to intervene and report can result in shared liability.

SAIWA - Security Agents Institute of Western Australia Test Practice Test

SAIWA - Security Agents Institute of Western Australia Test Practice Test

SAIWA Use of Force and Physical Intervention 2