Quality Assurance & Improvement Flashcards
7 cards from real SAC practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Quality Assurance & Improvement flashcards as text
A SAC program wants to track whether early warning indicators of student at-risk status are being identified promptly. This is BEST accomplished through:
Answer: A case-tracking system with time-to-identification metrics
A case-tracking system with time-to-identification metrics provides real-time data on whether at-risk students are being identified promptly.
Which action best demonstrates that a SAC counselor is using a data-driven approach to program improvement?
Answer: Adjusting intervention strategies after analyzing pre/post assessment results
Adjusting interventions based on pre/post assessment analysis demonstrates evidence-based, data-driven program improvement.
A SAC counselor is preparing a program report for school administration. Which type of data MOST effectively communicates program impact?
Answer: Percentage of students showing measurable improvement on targeted outcomes
Percentage of students showing measurable improvement on targeted outcomes directly demonstrates program impact, unlike process metrics like sessions held.
When a SAC program undergoes an external accreditation review, reviewers typically examine all of the following EXCEPT:
Answer: The personal financial records of the counselor
Accreditation reviews examine program quality, credentialing, and standards alignment — not the personal finances of individual counselors.
A school district SAC coordinator wants to reduce redundancy between counseling services and social work services. Which quality improvement strategy is MOST relevant?
Answer: Service mapping and role clarification across disciplines
Service mapping identifies overlaps and gaps, enabling role clarification and more efficient use of resources across disciplines.
A SAC counselor's program has a high rate of student no-shows to individual sessions. A quality improvement response would include:
Answer: Analyzing barriers to attendance and testing targeted reminder interventions
Analyzing barriers and testing reminder interventions is a systematic, data-informed response to improve session attendance rates.
In the context of SAC program evaluation, triangulation refers to:
Answer: Comparing findings across multiple data sources to validate conclusions
Triangulation strengthens evaluation validity by cross-verifying findings using multiple independent data sources or methods.