RCG Player Activity Statements 2

Question 1

What is the hierarchy of controls for managing Player Activity Statements risks?

Accepted Answer

Elimination, substitution, isolation, engineering, administrative, PPE — most to least effective

Answer

The hierarchy ranks controls from most effective (elimination) to least effective (PPE), guiding risk control decisions.

Question 2

How often should Player Activity Statements procedures be reviewed?

Accepted Answer

Regularly, after incidents, when conditions change, or when new information emerges

Answer

Procedures must be living documents, reviewed regularly and in response to changes, incidents, and new knowledge.

Question 3

What consultation requirements exist for Player Activity Statements under WHS law?

Accepted Answer

Workers must be consulted on matters affecting their health and safety, with genuine opportunity to provide input

Answer

WHS law requires genuine consultation with workers on matters affecting their safety, including through HSRs and committees.

Question 4

What emergency procedures should cover Player Activity Statements scenarios?

Accepted Answer

Response actions, evacuation, first aid, communication protocols, and specific hazard responses

Answer

Emergency procedures must be comprehensive and specific to the hazards associated with the activity.

Question 5

What penalties apply for non-compliance with Player Activity Statements regulations in Australia?

Accepted Answer

Significant fines (up to millions of AUD for corporations) and potential imprisonment for serious offences

Answer

Australian WHS penalties are severe, with Category 1 offences carrying fines up to AUD 3 million and potential imprisonment.

RCG NSW Practice Test