Fairness and Trust Scenarios Flashcards
7 cards from real Pymetrics Games practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Fairness and Trust Scenarios flashcards as text
Pymetrics scenario: You're offered a chance to invest company resources in a risky project with a 60% success rate and a 3x return. Your boss prefers safe bets. The decision that best balances fairness to stakeholders is:
Answer: Accept it since expected value is positive and justified
A positive expected value (60% × 3x = 1.8x) with clear justification balances fiduciary fairness to stakeholders against excessive risk avoidance.
In Pymetrics Trust Game variants, 'second-order trust' means:
Answer: Believing that others believe you are trustworthy
Second-order trust involves your belief about what others think of your own trustworthiness — a meta-level of social perception.
Pymetrics fairness scenario: After a merger, your team absorbs a new group. The new members feel excluded from decisions. The best fairness-building action is:
Answer: Immediately include them in decision-making processes
Procedural fairness — giving people voice in decisions — is one of the fastest ways to build trust after organizational change.
You repeatedly cooperate in a Pymetrics iterated Prisoner's Dilemma but your partner defects every time. The most effective strategy to restore fair play is:
Answer: Switch to Tit-for-Tat: mirror your partner's last move
Tit-for-Tat is proven to restore cooperation by rewarding cooperation and immediately punishing defection without permanent grudges.
Pymetrics measures 'effort discounting' in fairness contexts. Which scenario shows effort discounting?
Answer: Valuing a handmade gift more than a store-bought one of equal price
Effort discounting is the opposite — people tend to value things MORE when they know effort was invested, not less.
In Pymetrics social value orientation (SVO) tasks, a 'prosocial' individual will most likely:
Answer: Maximize joint gain and minimize the difference between payoffs
Prosocial SVO is defined by maximizing joint outcomes and reducing payoff inequality, balancing efficiency and fairness.
A Pymetrics scenario shows two job candidates: Candidate A has better qualifications; Candidate B is a personal friend of the hiring manager. Hiring Candidate B violates which fairness principle?
Answer: Meritocratic fairness
Meritocratic fairness requires rewards and opportunities to be allocated based on qualifications and performance, not personal relationships.
How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy
Sources & references
Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy
- pymetrics.com — Retake policy, score validity · verified Oct 2026
- harver.com — Exam format, score release, time limit · verified Oct 2026