Physician Assistant Academic Ability 3 โ Questions and Answers
Question 1: Which logical fallacy is committed when someone argues, 'You can't trust Dr. Smith's research on smoking because he once smoked himself'?
- Straw man
- Ad hominem (Correct answer)
- False dichotomy
- Slippery slope
Correct answer: Ad hominem
An ad hominem fallacy attacks the person rather than evaluating the merits of the argument or evidence.
Question 2: A table shows that 60 out of 400 patients developed a side effect. What percentage of patients experienced the side effect?
- 12%
- 15% (Correct answer)
- 18%
- 20%
Correct answer: 15%
60 / 400 = 0.15 = 15%.
Question 3: The word 'ameliorate' most nearly means:
- Worsen
- Improve (Correct answer)
- Evaluate
- Eliminate
Correct answer: Improve
To ameliorate means to make something bad or unsatisfactory better.
Question 4: A researcher wants to determine the median of the following data set: 7, 3, 12, 5, 9. What is the median?
- 7 (Correct answer)
- 9
- 5
- 3
Correct answer: 7
Ordered: 3, 5, 7, 9, 12 โ the middle value is 7.
Question 5: Which of the following is an example of deductive reasoning?
- Observing 100 patients recover and concluding the treatment works
- Noting that all mammals breathe air and concluding that whales breathe air (Correct answer)
- Surveying a sample and generalizing to a population
- Forming a hypothesis based on repeated clinical observations
Correct answer: Noting that all mammals breathe air and concluding that whales breathe air
Deductive reasoning applies a general rule (all mammals breathe air) to a specific case (whales) to reach a certain conclusion.
Question 6: A PA student must read a 180-page textbook chapter in 3 hours. At what rate must they read?
- 50 pages/hour
- 55 pages/hour
- 60 pages/hour (Correct answer)
- 65 pages/hour
Correct answer: 60 pages/hour
180 pages รท 3 hours = 60 pages per hour.
Question 7: The BEST way to strengthen an argument in an academic paper is to:
- Use emotional language to persuade the reader
- Cite peer-reviewed evidence that directly supports the claim (Correct answer)
- Repeat the thesis multiple times throughout the paper
- Present only one perspective without acknowledging counterarguments
Correct answer: Cite peer-reviewed evidence that directly supports the claim
Peer-reviewed evidence provides credible, verifiable support that directly strengthens academic arguments.
Which logical fallacy is committed when someone argues, 'You can't trust Dr.
Smith's research on smoking because he once smoked himself'?