PCC Earned Value Management Flashcards
6 cards from real PCC practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 6 PCC Earned Value Management flashcards as text
The Variance at Completion (VAC) formula in EVM is:
Answer: VAC = BAC − EAC
VAC = BAC − EAC; a negative VAC indicates the project is forecasted to overrun the original budget at completion.
In EVM reporting, an Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) is conducted to:
Answer: Verify the PMB is realistic, complete, and reflects the entire authorized scope
An IBR is a formal review between the customer and contractor to confirm the PMB is technically sound, fully scoped, and executable within budget and schedule.
Which EVM earned value technique is most appropriate for short-duration, discrete work packages that are fully complete or not yet started?
Answer: 0/100 rule
The 0/100 rule assigns 0% earned value until the work package is 100% complete, making it ideal for small, short-duration tasks.
Level of Effort (LOE) work in EVM is characterized by:
Answer: Support activities whose value accrues over time with no distinct end product
LOE encompasses ongoing support activities (e.g., project management, reporting) where SV is always zero because EV equals PV by definition.
A CPI of 1.10 on a US government project under ANSI/EIA-748 guidelines would most likely prompt the contractor to:
Answer: Report favorable cost performance and maintain the current approach
A CPI above 1.0 indicates the project is under budget (earning more value than spent), which is a positive condition requiring continued monitoring but no corrective action.
In project controls, an Over-Target Baseline (OTB) is established when:
Answer: Cumulative cost and schedule variances make the original PMB unrealistic for future management
An OTB is authorized when the PMB is so distorted by overruns that it no longer provides useful management information, requiring a rebaselining above the original budget.
How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. We have not yet matched this exam's facts to an official source, so confirm fees, dates and rules with the exam body. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy