← All PCC Flashcard Decks

Assessment and Evaluation Flashcards

7 cards from real PCC practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Assessment and Evaluation flashcards as text
  1. A program had costs of $50,000 and total monetary benefits of $80,000. Using the Phillips ROI formula, what is the ROI?

    Answer: 60%

    ROI = (benefits − costs) ÷ costs × 100 = 30,000 ÷ 50,000 = 60%.

  2. Which of the following is a LEADING indicator for a customer-retention consulting project?

    Answer: Customer satisfaction scores trending monthly

    Leading indicators signal future results before outcomes are realized.

  3. When two independent evaluators score the same client presentations and reach similar ratings, this shows:

    Answer: Inter-rater reliability

    Agreement between different raters is inter-rater reliability.

  4. A SMART objective for an evaluation must be all of the following EXCEPT:

    Answer: Theoretical

    SMART stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound.

  5. A consultant notices that productivity improved simply because employees knew they were being observed. This is the:

    Answer: Hawthorne effect

    The Hawthorne effect occurs when behavior changes due to awareness of being studied.

  6. Which assessment framework evaluates an organization across financial, customer, internal process, and learning & growth perspectives?

    Answer: Balanced Scorecard

    Kaplan and Norton's Balanced Scorecard uses these four perspectives.

  7. A summative evaluation is primarily used to:

    Answer: Judge overall merit or worth after completion

    Summative evaluation renders a final judgment on effectiveness.

How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. We have not yet matched this exam's facts to an official source, so confirm fees, dates and rules with the exam body. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy