Patentability Requirements & Procedures Flashcards
7 cards from real Patent Bar Exam practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Patentability Requirements & Procedures flashcards as text
Under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1), a disclosure does NOT qualify as prior art if it was made by the inventor and publicly disclosed within how many months before the effective filing date?
Answer: 12 months
Under the AIA, an inventor's own disclosure made within 12 months before the effective filing date is exempt from being prior art under § 102(a)(1).
Which doctrine prevents a patent applicant from recapturing claim scope that was surrendered during prosecution through claim amendments?
Answer: Both A and C
Prosecution history estoppel and file wrapper estoppel are two names for the same doctrine preventing recapture of surrendered claim scope.
A claimed invention is considered obvious under § 103 when the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art (PHOSITA) at the time of:
Answer: The effective filing date of the claimed invention
Obviousness under § 103 is evaluated from the perspective of a PHOSITA at the time of the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Under MPEP guidelines, which of the following is NOT one of the Graham v. John Deere factors used to assess obviousness?
Answer: The date of the inventor's conception
The Graham factors are: scope of prior art, differences from prior art, level of ordinary skill, and secondary considerations (like commercial success); conception date is not a Graham factor.
A patent application claims a chemical compound. The specification discloses how to make it but provides no data on utility. Under § 101, what type of utility must be demonstrated?
Answer: Specific, substantial, and credible utility
Under § 101, an invention must have specific, substantial, and credible utility — a vague or speculative utility is insufficient.
Under 35 U.S.C. § 112(f), a means-plus-function claim element is construed to cover:
Answer: The corresponding structure in the specification and its equivalents
Under § 112(f), means-plus-function elements are limited to the corresponding structure disclosed in the specification and its structural equivalents.
When an examiner issues a final rejection, an applicant may NOT do which of the following as a matter of right?
Answer: File additional claim amendments without a showing that they raise no new issues
After a final rejection, an applicant cannot freely add amendments; amendments after final are only entered at the examiner's discretion unless they clearly place the application in condition for allowance.
How this page was made: written with AI tools. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy
Sources & references
Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy