Ethics and Professional Responsibility Flashcards
7 cards from real Patent Bar Exam practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Ethics and Professional Responsibility flashcards as text
Under 37 CFR 11.108, a practitioner must not acquire a proprietary interest in the cause of action being litigated. However, which of the following interests IS permitted?
Answer: A contingent fee in a civil case as permitted by the rules
37 CFR 11.108 prohibits acquiring most proprietary interests in a client's matter but expressly permits contingent fee arrangements in civil cases.
Which of the following would constitute 'inequitable conduct' before the USPTO under the materiality standard?
Answer: Intentionally withholding a prior art reference that a reasonable examiner would consider important
Inequitable conduct requires intentional withholding of material information; a reference a reasonable examiner would consider important satisfies the materiality prong.
A practitioner receives a $10,000 advance fee from a client to handle a patent prosecution matter. Under 37 CFR 11.115, the practitioner must:
Answer: Hold the funds in a client trust account until earned
Under 37 CFR 11.115, unearned client funds must be held in a trust account separate from the practitioner's own funds until earned.
A practitioner's client asks the practitioner to file a continuation application with claim language that the practitioner believes is anticipated by prior art. The client disagrees with the practitioner's assessment. The practitioner should:
Answer: Advise the client of the practitioner's assessment but file if the client insists, unless doing so would violate the duty of candor
A practitioner advises the client but ultimately follows client instructions on objectives unless doing so would violate ethical rules such as the duty of candor.
Under the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct, when may a practitioner reveal confidential client information to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm?
Answer: The practitioner may reveal the information even without client consent
37 CFR 11.106(b)(1) permits disclosure of confidential information to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm, even without client consent.
What is the primary purpose of the USPTO Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED)?
Answer: To regulate the conduct of registered practitioners and investigate complaints of misconduct
The OED is responsible for registering practitioners and disciplining those who violate the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct.
A practitioner who is registered to practice before the USPTO but is not licensed as an attorney may do which of the following?
Answer: Prepare and prosecute patent applications before the USPTO
A registered patent agent may prepare and prosecute patent applications but may not represent clients in court or provide legal opinions beyond USPTO practice.
How this page was made: written with AI tools. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy
Sources & references
Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy