Advanced Reading 6 Flashcards
6 cards from real PARCC practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 6 Advanced Reading 6 flashcards as text
A student researching early 20th-century labor movements reads both a 1912 speech by a union leader and a modern economics textbook chapter on the same era. Which statement best explains why a researcher would need BOTH sources to fully understand the topic?
Answer: The speech captures the emotional urgency and specific demands of workers at the time, while the textbook provides broader historical patterns and outcomes.
Each source type offers something the other cannot: the primary source conveys lived perspective and specific demands, while the secondary source provides analytical distance and broader context. Together they produce a fuller understanding than either alone.
An author arguing for stricter environmental regulations opens her essay by writing: 'Economic growth and job creation are vital concerns that no serious person dismisses.' She then pivots to argue that long-term environmental collapse threatens those very goals. This rhetorical move is best described as:
Answer: A concession followed by a rebuttal, designed to build credibility before countering.
Acknowledging a valid concern held by the opposing side — then turning that concern into support for your own argument — is a classic concession-rebuttal structure. It builds the author's credibility and disarms the counterargument before it can be raised.
In a novel, a young narrator describes his father as 'the bravest man in town,' yet every scene the narrator recounts shows the father deferring to others, avoiding conflict, and letting neighbors take risks on his behalf. A skilled reader would interpret this pattern as:
Answer: Evidence of an unreliable or naive narrator whose stated characterization contradicts the textual evidence.
When a narrator's explicit claim about a character is consistently contradicted by the scenes presented, it signals an unreliable or naive narrator. Skilled readers look beyond stated characterizations to what the evidence in the text actually demonstrates.
A reader encounters the phrase 'the council's decision proved Pyrrhic' in a passage describing a city that won a lengthy legal battle but exhausted its entire public works budget in legal fees, leaving roads and bridges unrepaired. Which strategy most effectively determines the meaning of 'Pyrrhic'?
Answer: Use the contextual detail that the victory came at a cost that negated its benefit.
The passage immediately supplies the meaning through context: the city 'won' but was left unable to fund essential services. Pyrrhic victory — a win so costly it amounts to a loss — is fully decoded through these surrounding details without needing an external source.
An author structures a long-form essay as follows: Section 1 summarizes the scientific consensus on ocean acidification; Section 2 presents interviews with three marine biologists who agree on the problem but disagree sharply on solutions; Section 3 proposes a policy framework that synthesizes the experts' views. This organizational pattern is best described as:
Answer: Problem-solution structure with embedded multiple perspectives that complicate and enrich the proposed solution.
The essay moves from establishing a shared problem, to complicating it by exposing expert disagreement, to synthesizing those perspectives into a solution — a problem-solution structure that uses multiple viewpoints to strengthen rather than fragment the argument.
A poem opens with six stanzas of imagery depicting a frozen, colorless landscape — bare branches, cracked earth, silence. The final two lines describe a single green shoot pushing through ice without comment or explanation. Without any explicit statement of meaning, the central theme a reader can most reasonably infer is:
Answer: Renewal and hope can emerge from even the most desolate circumstances.
The deliberate structural contrast — sustained desolation followed by a single image of emergence — functions as an implicit argument. The green shoot becomes a symbol of renewal rising from hardship, and the poem's architecture conveys this theme without stating it directly.