Text 1
Literary critic Aisha Ahmed posits that the rise of serialized fiction in the 19th century, disseminated through affordable periodicals, fundamentally democratized literature. She argues this format made complex narratives accessible to a wider audience, fostering a shared cultural experience across different social strata. Ahmed contends that without this medium, the novel as we know it might have remained a form of entertainment exclusive to the elite.
Text 2
Historian Ben Carter challenges the conventional view of serialized fiction as a purely democratizing force. His research on reader correspondence from the period reveals that publishers often altered plotlines and character arcs in response to feedback from a vocal minority of their affluent subscribers. Carter suggests that this commercial pressure meant that far from being a shared cultural experience, serialized narratives often reinforced the conservative values of their most economically powerful readers, thereby limiting the scope of their democratic potential.
Based on the texts, how would Carter (Text 2) most likely respond to Ahmed's (Text 1) characterization of serialized fiction?
-
A
By arguing that it was a commercial enterprise that prioritized the views of a select readership over a truly democratic cultural exchange.
-
B
By confirming that serialized fiction broadened access to literature but questioning the quality of the works produced.
-
C
By suggesting that the affordability of periodicals was less significant than the literacy rates of the general population.
-
D
By conceding that it created a shared cultural experience but arguing that this experience was controlled by the authors, not the readers.