Text 1
Literary critic Henri Peyre, in his 1968 analysis of Arthur Rimbaud's poetry, argues that the poet's revolutionary use of syntax and sensory imagery was not a descent into incoherence but a deliberate, methodical construction of a new poetic language. Peyre asserts that to read Rimbaud as a purveyor of chaos is to fundamentally misunderstand his project, which was to systematically 'disorder' the senses to achieve a higher, more lucid state of perception.
Text 2
In a 2011 biographical study, scholar Graham Robb contends that while Rimbaud's later works, particularly 'A Season in Hell,' exhibit a high degree of artistic control, his earlier poems, such as those in the 'Poésies' collection, are characterized by the volatile, often contradictory impulses of an adolescent genius. Robb suggests that the apparent 'disordering' in these early works is less a systematic project and more a reflection of a tumultuous inner life, a raw out-pouring rather than a calculated deconstruction of language.
Based on the texts, how would Robb (Text 2) most likely respond to Peyre's (Text 1) characterization of Rimbaud's entire body of work?
-
A
By arguing that Peyre's model of a systematic project applies to Rimbaud's later works but overlooks the unsystematic, emotional nature of his earlier poetry.
-
B
By confirming that Peyre's assessment of a 'methodical construction' is the only valid way to interpret Rimbaud's complete poetic output.
-
C
By suggesting that Peyre has mistaken the deliberate chaos of Rimbaud's personal life for a calculated literary technique.
-
D
By asserting that the concept of 'disordering the senses' was a popular literary trend at the time and not unique to Rimbaud's work.